Contributions
These are all contributions and replies sorted latest first (Markdown version).
Contributions:
-
better-wording-for-glossary-notation-
Better wording for "Glossary notation"
Proposal
2021-09-24 11:33:41 -
better-wording-for-data-field-term
Better wording for "data field" term
Proposal
2021-09-14 08:55:49 -
specify-that-0-throw-pops-the-0
Specify that 0 THROW pops the 0
Proposal
2021-09-11 12:25:15 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-08 10:15:49 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-02 10:52:45 -
2021-standards-meeting-agenda
2021 Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2021-09-01 14:46:10 -
testsuite
Missed-order in section F.3.10 Division
Example
2021-08-21 14:29:36 -
core, WHILE
There is an error in testing
Comment
2021-08-20 20:54:31 -
core, DEPTH
More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-08-18 13:39:23 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-07-30 11:19:29 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-14 17:47:02 -
double, TwoVALUE
Mistake in implementation?
Comment
2021-06-27 15:30:11 -
string, DivSTRING
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-21 17:58:29 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-19 13:04:00 -
file, Sq
Implementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanism
Request for clarification
2021-05-18 01:22:07 -
wording-change-for-compile-harmonization-with-terms
Wording change for "COMPILE,": harmonization with terms
Proposal
2021-05-15 17:53:09 -
double, DtoS
Inaccurate Test Cases?
Suggested Testcase
2021-05-14 20:22:32 -
core, POSTPONE
Portable implementation for POSTPONE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-06 09:19:58 -
right-bracket
Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-05-05 17:24:29 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-04-30 19:05:32 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
A final test case for [COMPILE]
Suggested Testcase
2021-04-28 23:36:43 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-04-28 22:47:11 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-04-25 19:52:16 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
How to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]
Comment
2021-04-21 09:46:05 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-19 19:06:28 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-18 09:07:57 -
core, STATE
Advantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 07:08:48 -
core, TO
What is the intent, purpose or meaning of TO?
Example
2021-04-17 06:23:37 -
reference-implementations-are-not-normative
Reference implementations are not normative
Proposal
2021-04-15 08:17:45 -
core, DEFERStore
Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-14 17:41:19 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-04 10:35:03 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-03 15:34:40 -
usage
Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-03-30 16:05:59 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-03-13 22:39:27 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-10 14:50:29 -
block, BLOCK
Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-03-05 13:31:11 -
block, BLOCK
Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-03-05 13:16:46 -
locals, bColon
Run-Time Section is Missing Words
Comment
2021-01-23 01:10:23 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-22 03:42:24 -
core, Tick
Is Tick Immediate?
Request for clarification
2021-01-22 02:52:22 -
core, POSTPONE
GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-01-21 06:32:53 -
memory, ALLOCATE
write-cell-mem undefined
Request for clarification
2021-01-13 03:56:09 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
Obsoleted - by what?
Request for clarification
2021-01-05 08:24:25 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2020-12-27 08:43:01 -
core, SOURCE-ID
Should this reference the optional word sets where SOURCE-ID is changed
Example
2020-12-27 08:40:17 -
exception, THROW
THROW: text doesn't match implementation example
Comment
2020-12-06 08:05:30 -
core, TwoStore
Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2020-12-01 11:21:26 -
usage
Data object notion usage
Comment
2020-12-01 10:58:24 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Query re status; and minor comments
Comment
2020-11-29 06:32:26 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-27 07:13:33 -
search, DEFINITIONS
off-by-one error in reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2020-11-13 18:43:12 -
search, SET-ORDER
Typo in stack comment
Comment
2020-11-04 17:07:33 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2020-10-29 00:28:43 -
core, MARKER
Extending MARKER
Request for clarification
2020-09-16 15:33:45 -
common-terminology-for-recognizers-discurse-and-specifications
Common terminology for recognizers discurse and specifications
Proposal
2020-09-07 13:56:43 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-06 09:40:07 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-05 15:09:39 -
licence-to-use-reference-implementations
Licence to use reference implementations
Proposal
2020-09-03 15:13:50 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2020-09-03 11:55:03 -
interpretation-semantic-for-locals-are-undefined
Interpretation semantic for locals are undefined
Proposal
2020-09-02 20:57:52 -
call-for-vote-ambiguous-condition-in-16-3-3
Call for Vote - Ambiguous condition in 16.3.3
Proposal
2020-09-02 11:16:03 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-09-01 21:16:26 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-01 17:41:58 -
core, LOOP
Missing comma
Comment
2020-08-31 19:28:21 -
tools
Getting execution semantics from nt
Request for clarification
2020-08-29 08:10:26 -
search
Get execution semantics from nt
Request for clarification
2020-08-28 11:29:47 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-08-22 16:09:52 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-21 21:03:51 -
rationale
Annex A section and paragraph numbering has gone wrong
Request for clarification
2020-08-21 18:41:19 -
2020-forth-standards-meeting-agenda
2020 Forth Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2020-08-11 21:39:27 -
testsuite
Please fix word spelling in F.1 second paragraph second word.
Suggested reference implementation
2020-08-08 10:00:59 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-01 13:42:29 -
tools, SYNONYM
Does the wording of the rules imply that if you SYNONYM a word with the same name in the same wordlist and then 'look it up', you will get the old word?
Request for clarification
2020-07-26 11:22:42 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-07-20 20:36:30 -
core, DEFER
Defer Implementation
Comment
2020-06-29 06:48:12 -
Overhaul 2020: Proposals
Comment
2020-06-23 22:45:08 -
core, SMDivREM
There is error in testing
Comment
2020-06-21 09:31:29 -
locals
Recognizer for locals
Comment
2020-06-10 02:47:06 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
Same name token for different words
Proposal
2020-06-09 16:36:22 -
core, StoD
Word set of S>D word
Request for clarification
2020-05-29 10:10:51 -
tools, BracketELSE
Reference implementation does not seem to cope with changes to the stack
Request for clarification
2020-04-10 23:20:57 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-03-08 15:18:59 -
core, p
"(" typo in a testcase
Comment
2020-02-25 23:15:38 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-02-24 09:57:56 -
core, Colon
The parts of execution semantics and the calling definition
Request for clarification
2020-02-21 15:32:19 -
name-interpret-wording
NAME>INTERPRET wording
Proposal
2020-02-20 09:55:14 -
better-wording-for-colon
Better wording for Colon
Proposal
2020-02-06 02:14:04 -
core, WITHIN
sample implementation that can also be interpreted
Suggested reference implementation
2020-02-05 20:49:51 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-11 12:07:07 -
core, RECURSE
Why RECURSE is needed?
Request for clarification
2020-01-09 21:15:01 -
string, REPLACES
wording - "current region" term is undefined
Comment
2019-10-29 08:16:43 -
implement
license
Request for clarification
2019-10-23 11:57:39 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2019-10-08 11:01:25 -
tools, BracketELSE
Case-sensitivity independent implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2019-10-03 14:30:28 -
tools, SYNONYM
Test cases for SYNONYM
Suggested Testcase
2019-10-01 18:41:26 -
tools, SYNONYM
Reference implementation of SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2019-10-01 18:34:20 -
tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLIST
Unfindable definitions
Comment
2019-09-20 23:23:52 -
vocabulary
VOCABULARY
Proposal
2019-09-18 12:32:53 -
tools, SYNONYM
Reference implementation and POSTPONE
Comment
2019-09-13 09:53:48 -
remove-the-rules-of-find-
Remove the “rules of FIND”
Proposal
2019-09-12 09:09:51 -
case-insensitivity
Case insensitivity
Proposal
2019-09-06 18:27:48 -
cs-drop-revised-2019-08-22-
CS-DROP (revised 2019-08-22)
Proposal
2019-09-06 08:24:28 -
core, IMMEDIATE
Ambiguous conditions
Comment
2019-09-04 09:38:20 -
file, REFILL
Ambiguous conditions
Request for clarification
2019-08-28 13:06:05 -
core, toIN
Etymology of ">IN" name
Request for clarification
2019-08-26 12:25:27 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-08-25 21:58:52 -
block, LIST
Does LIST transfer data to any buffer?
Request for clarification
2019-08-11 15:53:04 -
Search box
Comment
2019-08-10 00:39:41 -
block, LOAD
Getting the block contents
Request for clarification
2019-08-10 00:37:10 -
block, EVALUATE
When to set BLK to zero?
Request for clarification
2019-08-09 23:21:51 -
core
GNU C RESTRICT would make sense in the standard
Suggested reference implementation
2019-08-05 17:25:38 -
core, EVALUATE
SOURCE-ID and nesting EVALUATE
Request for clarification
2019-08-04 15:14:25 -
core, toIN
Environment dependence of test cases
Request for clarification
2019-08-03 12:56:27 -
right-justified-text-output
Right-justified text output
Proposal
2019-08-01 22:07:03 -
searching-for-right-bracket-doesn-t-return-
Searching for ] (right-bracket) doesn't return ]
Proposal
2019-08-01 16:07:34 -
core, BL
Test example numeric base?
Request for clarification
2019-08-01 00:27:14 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-07-19 15:08:09 -
exception, CATCH
The specification of CATCH
Request for clarification
2019-07-19 14:52:07 -
core, Tick
Ambiguous condition in case of undefined execution semantics
Comment
2019-07-16 15:12:55 -
core, TO
Ambiguous conditions
Request for clarification
2019-07-14 09:59:48 -
executing-compilation-semantics
Executing compilation semantics
Proposal
2019-07-12 04:16:14 -
tools, BracketIF
POSTPONE [IF]
Request for clarification
2019-07-10 14:52:51 -
core, PARSE-NAME
Etymology and naming convention issue
Comment
2019-07-09 17:08:46 -
core, BUFFERColon
Address between runs
Request for clarification
2019-07-09 12:54:28 -
revise-rationale-of-buffer-
Revise Rationale of Buffer:
Proposal
2019-07-06 15:45:25 -
notation
What is a standard program
Comment
2019-07-03 11:42:27 -
tools, NAMEtoINTERPRET
How can the zero result be used in a Standard program?
Request for clarification
2019-07-02 10:29:22 -
core, COMPILEComma
Interpretation semantics
Comment
2019-06-26 12:50:14 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-06-26 12:09:31 -
string, UNESCAPE
Etymology and naming issue
Request for clarification
2019-06-25 09:18:19 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2019-06-22 13:42:50 -
core, EXIT
execution of exit
Request for clarification
2019-06-20 16:01:08 -
notation
Terminology and wording regarding "dictionary"
Request for clarification
2019-06-04 08:26:12 -
core, Plus
Overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2019-05-21 23:30:20 -
core, PlusLOOP
Numeric overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2019-05-21 03:17:42 -
core, ACCEPT
Receiving a zero-length string
Request for clarification
2019-05-20 20:19:43 -
core, CHAR
Behavior when no text found
Comment
2019-05-19 13:57:46 -
core, ACCEPT
Behavior at end of line and end of data
Request for clarification
2019-05-11 12:15:10 -
core, QUIT
The reference implementation is incorrect
Suggested reference implementation
2019-03-16 14:59:29 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2019-03-03 06:20:52 -
tools, BracketELSE
[if] and [else] parse white space - including comments
Request for clarification
2019-02-08 15:23:02 -
case-sensitivity
Case sensitivity
Proposal
2018-11-03 13:15:53 -
core, TO
Should TO be findable?
Request for clarification
2018-09-22 09:05:37 -
revised-proposal-process
Revised Proposal Process
Proposal
2018-09-21 06:49:42 -
search, ALSO
ALSO without VOCABULARY
Request for clarification
2018-09-18 12:51:27 -
core, BUFFERColon
the confusing names
Request for clarification
2018-09-11 18:09:27 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Multi-Tasking Proposal
Proposal
2018-09-06 17:19:38 -
cs-drop-revised-2018-08-20-
CS-DROP (revised 2018-08-20)
Proposal
2018-08-20 20:22:25 -
s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-
S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)
Proposal
2018-08-17 16:27:53 -
let-us-adopt-the-gerry-jackson-test-suite-as-part-of-forth-200x
Let us adopt the Gerry Jackson test suite as part of Forth 200x
Proposal
2018-07-10 14:38:46 -
xchar, XHOLD
Prepend, not add
Example
2018-06-28 11:05:25 -
core, HOLDS
Specification of HOLDS is ambiguous
Comment
2018-06-27 15:59:05 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-08 10:09:18 -
How to change email address
Request for clarification
2018-06-06 12:08:03 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-25 12:26:23 -
Need lock on already posted comments
Example
2018-05-24 12:28:32 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-05-24 08:13:36 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-23 17:04:29 -
tools, BracketELSE
[ELSE] without preceding [IF]
Comment
2018-05-13 18:36:50 -
core, INVERT
Successful test cases would be good
Suggested Testcase
2018-02-28 05:03:11 -
Standard 2012 as slightly reduced version - but as Part of the Forth Bookshelf
Suggested reference implementation
2018-02-25 11:57:31 -
core, Seq
Reference implementation for S\"
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-30 08:13:52 -
core, FMDivMOD
Implementing FM/MOD with SM/REM
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-22 15:32:49 -
core, CComma
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 17:54:46 -
core, TUCK
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:20:49 -
core, NIP
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:20:21 -
core, HEX
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:19:18 -
core, BracketCHAR
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:18:19 -
core, BracketTick
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:17:01 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:15:17 -
core, OVER
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:13:51 -
core, TwoOVER
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:13:14 -
core, TwoSWAP
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:12:03 -
core, TwoDUP
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:11:16 -
core, TwoDROP
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:10:48 -
core, FILL
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-06 18:08:55 -
exception-locals
EXCEPTION LOCALs
Proposal
2017-10-28 07:04:49 -
core, PARSE-NAME
Space delimiters and white space
Comment
2017-10-26 16:45:24 -
bl-rationale-is-wrong
BL rationale is wrong
Proposal
2017-10-25 11:35:46 -
usage
Bug in 3.4.1.3
Example
2017-10-25 11:16:43 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2017-09-03 11:07:49 -
file, BIN
Text mode is a bad idea for file opening
Comment
2017-08-15 16:54:05 -
string, SUBSTITUTE
Case sensitivity
Request for clarification
2017-07-10 18:29:41 -
core-ext-s-should-reference-file-ext-s-
Core-ext S\" should reference File-ext S\"
Proposal
2017-04-16 08:03:17 -
xchar, X-SIZE
UTF-8 and Unicode codepoint maximum
Request for clarification
2017-02-14 19:53:17 -
Session timer and preseving contributions
Example
2016-12-31 22:07:36 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2016-12-21 14:39:40 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-12 15:42:57 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-11-22 10:02:04 -
core, ACCEPT
Source of a string
Request for clarification
2016-10-01 12:47:01 -
defer-this-not-
DEFER this not :-)
Proposal
2016-09-02 16:14:36 -
float
Mistake in the specification of significand?
Example
2016-07-03 16:20:50 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-18 04:19:03 -
tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLIST
TRAVERSE-WORDLIST is in the wrong word set
Comment
2016-05-22 20:03:53 -
core, UNLOOP
Another use of UNLOOP
Suggested Testcase
2016-05-16 21:55:15 -
core, EVALUATE
Check for evaluate SOURCE is the string itself, not a copy
Suggested Testcase
2016-03-21 02:32:54 -
usage
3.3.3.5 Input buffer: "A program shall not write into the input buffer."
Comment
2016-03-21 02:27:27 -
rationale
OF implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2016-02-06 13:57:57 -
file, READ-LINE
Dealing with newlines
Comment
2016-02-02 15:47:01 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2016-01-13 20:48:24 -
Digests and Meta discussion
Example
2016-01-08 18:42:54 -
core, Tick
Request for clarification
2015-12-25 23:32:43 -
core, EMIT
emit fortified :-)
Comment
2015-12-13 19:01:24 -
core, RECURSE
proposal: recurse' to complement recurse
Comment
2015-12-03 23:46:08 -
core, BL
An example
Example
2015-11-29 23:58:06 -
core, SPACES
Obvious implementation
Example
2015-11-29 23:56:42 -
core, SPACE
Obvious implementation
Example
2015-11-29 23:55:49 -
core, BracketCHAR
Reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2015-11-27 23:35:05 -
core, CHAR
Non-XCHAR implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2015-11-27 20:45:54 -
core, ABS
Reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2015-11-27 19:31:02 -
core, BL
ASCII version of BL
Suggested reference implementation
2015-11-27 19:14:22
Replies:
-
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-16 01:02:23 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-09-16 00:20:38 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-14 11:38:47 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-13 17:27:31 -
wording-change-for-compile-harmonization-with-terms
Wording change for "COMPILE,": harmonization with terms
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:12:42 -
reference-implementations-are-not-normative
Reference implementations are not normative
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:06:10 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:04:42 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:02:04 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-13 08:55:46 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-12 15:31:01 -
exception, THROW
THROW: text doesn't match implementation example
Comment
2021-09-11 12:29:27 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
How to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]
Comment
2021-09-11 12:04:39 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-09-11 11:47:00 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-11 11:35:15 -
double, DtoS
Inaccurate Test Cases?
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-11 11:27:05 -
core, DEPTH
More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-11 11:05:05 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-11 08:02:18 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-10 07:57:06 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-09 21:10:24 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-09 16:24:16 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-09 16:15:06 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2021-09-09 14:51:39 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2021-09-09 14:42:52 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Query re status; and minor comments
Comment
2021-09-09 14:40:18 -
core, TwoStore
Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2021-09-09 14:25:25 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-09-09 14:13:40 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-09-09 14:12:06 -
file, Sq
Implementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanism
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 14:11:18 -
memory, ALLOCATE
write-cell-mem undefined
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 13:46:33 -
core, POSTPONE
GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 13:44:53 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-09 11:06:55 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-09 08:42:32 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-08 21:15:27 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
Same name token for different words
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:43:45 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:37:22 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:00:46 -
core, Tick
Is Tick Immediate?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:52:12 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:44:39 -
block, BLOCK
Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:30:28 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:28:20 -
usage
Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:20:31 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:14:00 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:04:25 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:57:55 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:57:22 -
right-bracket
Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:48:46 -
file, Sq
Implementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanism
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:39:19 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:18:38 -
interpretation-semantic-for-locals-are-undefined
Interpretation semantic for locals are undefined
Proposal
2021-09-07 14:22:37 -
2021-standards-meeting-agenda
2021 Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2021-09-07 06:32:09 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-04 13:05:38 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-04 07:48:45 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 11:12:27 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 09:26:00 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 03:30:03 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-02 16:47:00 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-02 15:39:16 -
usage
Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-09-01 13:33:38 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-09-01 11:22:26 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-01 10:15:24 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-08-21 17:38:45 -
core, WHILE
There is an error in testing
Comment
2021-08-21 09:48:45 -
core, WHILE
There is an error in testing
Comment
2021-08-20 21:56:52 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-08-20 11:25:13 -
core, DEPTH
More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-08-19 13:34:23 -
core, DEPTH
More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-08-19 02:27:37 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-07-30 13:47:38 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-19 17:20:10 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-19 08:23:12 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-18 12:21:20 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-07-07 12:42:12 -
core, BUFFERColon
Address between runs
Request for clarification
2021-07-07 12:31:02 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-07-05 14:40:42 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-07-03 17:32:21 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-07-01 10:37:45 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2021-06-28 08:12:15 -
double, TwoVALUE
Mistake in implementation?
Comment
2021-06-28 07:00:03 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2021-06-24 16:37:28 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-06-12 13:43:19 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-06-12 13:32:48 -
string, DivSTRING
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-24 14:56:22 -
string, DivSTRING
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-22 08:21:49 -
string, DivSTRING
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-21 22:33:11 -
core, POSTPONE
Portable implementation for POSTPONE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-15 21:09:40 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2021-05-15 18:22:00 -
double, DtoS
Inaccurate Test Cases?
Suggested Testcase
2021-05-15 10:21:56 -
right-bracket
Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-05-09 12:27:46 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 22:10:06 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 20:17:28 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 17:53:36 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 17:14:50 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 14:54:39 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 11:10:38 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 11:10:14 -
right-bracket
Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 07:49:42 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-05-06 13:44:41 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-05-06 11:39:03 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2021-05-06 08:00:44 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-05-02 15:10:25 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-02 12:32:34 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-04-30 17:16:31 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-28 02:09:40 -
core, COMPILEComma
Interpretation semantics
Comment
2021-04-27 14:24:58 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-23 16:38:42 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-23 07:44:55 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-22 16:39:54 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-22 02:03:15 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
How to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]
Comment
2021-04-21 14:38:53 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-20 21:06:38 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-20 14:20:32 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 21:28:53 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 20:28:10 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 20:16:56 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 18:24:43 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2021-04-19 17:05:40 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2021-04-19 12:33:49 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 12:15:56 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 11:39:14 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-19 11:03:24 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 07:08:09 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 06:50:23 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 06:30:23 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 04:55:23 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 04:51:00 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2021-04-19 04:21:03 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 04:09:12 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-18 16:04:18 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-18 15:43:13 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-18 10:10:31 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-18 08:23:54 -
core, STATE
Advantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 17:49:29 -
core, DEFERStore
Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 17:34:37 -
core, TO
What is the intent, purpose or meaning of TO?
Example
2021-04-17 16:14:14 -
core, STATE
Advantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 15:08:48 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-17 09:23:48 -
reference-implementations-are-not-normative
Reference implementations are not normative
Proposal
2021-04-15 12:47:32 -
core, DEFERStore
Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-15 10:29:49 -
core, DEFERStore
Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-15 07:34:17 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-10 09:14:58 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-08 11:25:35 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 12:53:15 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 10:17:39 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-07 10:09:00 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 08:16:04 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-06 11:54:14 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-06 06:23:08 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 11:10:42 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 10:12:01 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 02:08:59 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 15:57:41 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 15:15:25 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 01:53:23 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-04-03 08:37:52 -
usage
Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-03-30 18:43:47 -
core, TwoOVER
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-03-26 19:57:04 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-03-14 18:43:52 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-03-14 02:01:49 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 22:40:05 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 08:59:39 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 08:44:13 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 02:12:02 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-12 16:32:58 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-12 07:48:49 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-03-09 19:11:06 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-09 16:02:58 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-08 21:21:49 -
block, BLOCK
Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 11:03:41 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 08:31:05 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 05:18:27 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-06 16:47:27 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-03 04:39:08 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-03 03:53:14 -
core, HOLDS
Specification of HOLDS is ambiguous
Comment
2021-02-19 06:40:29 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-05 08:15:33 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-05 08:12:42 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-02 10:04:10 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-24 10:39:29 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-24 04:43:29 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-23 12:56:09 -
core, Tick
Is Tick Immediate?
Request for clarification
2021-01-23 09:33:09 -
locals, bColon
Run-Time Section is Missing Words
Comment
2021-01-23 09:24:39 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-23 01:36:26 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-01-22 20:48:21 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-22 10:39:10 -
core, POSTPONE
GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-01-22 02:42:43 -
core, POSTPONE
GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-01-21 16:20:49 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2021-01-14 17:15:18 -
memory, ALLOCATE
write-cell-mem undefined
Request for clarification
2021-01-13 08:41:17 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2021-01-07 01:57:20 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
Obsoleted - by what?
Request for clarification
2021-01-06 10:06:23 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2020-12-29 07:27:48 -
core, SOURCE-ID
Should this reference the optional word sets where SOURCE-ID is changed
Example
2020-12-29 07:14:19 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-23 18:24:58 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-09 13:58:40 -
core, TwoStore
Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2020-12-05 10:01:24 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-05 09:31:00 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-02 15:05:55 -
core, TwoStore
Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2020-12-02 11:42:20 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-01 11:54:46 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-11-28 19:19:56 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 14:07:05 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 11:48:07 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 11:28:08 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 09:06:42 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 01:21:15 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-11-20 14:25:42 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-11-19 19:58:48 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2020-11-17 15:48:41 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-11-17 09:40:35 -
search, DEFINITIONS
off-by-one error in reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2020-11-14 14:51:43 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2020-10-31 21:19:03 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2020-10-31 17:24:02 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-10-29 00:48:42 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2020-10-22 03:09:51 -
testsuite
Please fix word spelling in F.1 second paragraph second word.
Suggested reference implementation
2020-09-26 17:10:03 -
core, DEFER
Defer Implementation
Comment
2020-09-26 16:59:35 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-09-26 16:16:33 -
name-interpret-wording
NAME>INTERPRET wording
Proposal
2020-09-25 18:37:37 -
better-wording-for-colon
Better wording for Colon
Proposal
2020-09-25 18:13:57 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-09-25 18:05:08 -
string, REPLACES
wording - "current region" term is undefined
Comment
2020-09-25 17:57:53 -
licence-to-use-reference-implementations
Licence to use reference implementations
Proposal
2020-09-25 17:46:06 -
vocabulary
VOCABULARY
Proposal
2020-09-25 17:16:55 -
tools, SYNONYM
Reference implementation of SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2020-09-25 17:11:24 -
core, IMMEDIATE
Ambiguous conditions
Comment
2020-09-25 16:40:00 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-22 17:05:31 -
2020-forth-standards-meeting-agenda
2020 Forth Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2020-09-22 16:01:25 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-22 09:44:37 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-22 00:00:44 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-21 16:55:37 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-21 13:23:29 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-09-20 17:35:38 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-19 12:24:09 -
core, MARKER
Extending MARKER
Request for clarification
2020-09-17 05:34:07 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-16 20:25:35 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-09-16 17:17:50 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-16 14:26:03 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-15 10:04:01 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-14 21:33:55 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 13:25:16 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 13:21:26 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 09:20:04 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 09:12:42 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-13 16:19:15 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-13 06:49:49 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-12 22:51:48 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-12 13:12:35 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-12 07:46:25 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 21:55:54 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 17:45:12 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 12:23:36 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 04:10:31 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 03:46:35 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-10 21:36:12 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-09-10 15:43:15 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-09-10 12:50:53 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-09 08:25:37 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-09 08:13:21 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 20:14:11 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 16:45:16 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 14:48:20 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 11:33:30 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 08:39:23 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 08:36:42 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 18:02:52 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-07 17:41:42 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-07 17:29:43 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 17:12:08 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-07 16:50:59 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 15:58:29 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 15:10:04 -
common-terminology-for-recognizers-discurse-and-specifications
Common terminology for recognizers discurse and specifications
Proposal
2020-09-07 14:03:37 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 10:20:28 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-06 20:38:26 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-06 20:35:46 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-06 20:25:08 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-06 19:02:34 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-06 17:42:23 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-06 16:10:33 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-06 13:08:07 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-06 12:43:23 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-06 06:37:35 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-05 23:06:38 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-05 21:40:18 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-05 15:29:50 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-05 15:23:52 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-04 20:21:59 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-04 17:52:36 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-04 11:53:28 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-03 19:37:40 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-03 17:37:15 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2020-09-03 17:17:39 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2020-09-03 17:05:44 -
tools, BracketELSE
Case-sensitivity independent implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2020-09-03 16:16:44 -
tools, BracketELSE
Reference implementation does not seem to cope with changes to the stack
Request for clarification
2020-09-03 16:13:59 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-03 15:43:48 -
licence-to-use-reference-implementations
Licence to use reference implementations
Proposal
2020-09-03 15:36:47 -
licence-to-use-reference-implementations
Licence to use reference implementations
Proposal
2020-09-03 15:30:37 -
implement
license
Request for clarification
2020-09-03 15:16:10 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2020-09-03 14:50:43 -
cs-drop-revised-2019-08-22-
CS-DROP (revised 2019-08-22)
Proposal
2020-09-03 13:58:50 -
core, SMDivREM
There is error in testing
Comment
2020-09-03 13:29:53 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-03 13:06:12 -
cs-drop-revised-2019-08-22-
CS-DROP (revised 2019-08-22)
Proposal
2020-09-03 12:26:48 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-09-03 11:43:41 -
cs-drop-revised-2019-08-22-
CS-DROP (revised 2019-08-22)
Proposal
2020-09-03 11:43:10 -
cs-drop-revised-2019-08-22-
CS-DROP (revised 2019-08-22)
Proposal
2020-09-03 11:20:11 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-09-03 10:04:21 -
call-for-vote-ambiguous-condition-in-16-3-3
Call for Vote - Ambiguous condition in 16.3.3
Proposal
2020-09-03 08:53:24 -
core, StoD
Word set of S>D word
Request for clarification
2020-09-02 21:10:07 -
core, WITHIN
sample implementation that can also be interpreted
Suggested reference implementation
2020-09-02 15:31:15 -
core, RECURSE
Why RECURSE is needed?
Request for clarification
2020-09-02 15:28:08 -
remove-the-rules-of-find-
Remove the “rules of FIND”
Proposal
2020-09-02 13:55:59 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-02 13:10:42 -
call-for-vote-ambiguous-condition-in-16-3-3
Call for Vote - Ambiguous condition in 16.3.3
Proposal
2020-09-02 12:19:35 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-02 12:15:59 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-02 11:56:44 -
call-for-vote-ambiguous-condition-in-16-3-3
Call for Vote - Ambiguous condition in 16.3.3
Proposal
2020-09-02 11:17:55 -
remove-the-rules-of-find-
Remove the “rules of FIND”
Proposal
2020-09-02 09:40:34 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-02 07:44:20 -
remove-the-rules-of-find-
Remove the “rules of FIND”
Proposal
2020-09-02 07:24:19 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-09-02 05:59:27 -
remove-the-rules-of-find-
Remove the “rules of FIND”
Proposal
2020-09-01 19:34:59 -
tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLIST
Unfindable definitions
Comment
2020-09-01 17:43:40 -
vocabulary
VOCABULARY
Proposal
2020-09-01 16:17:01 -
remove-the-rules-of-find-
Remove the “rules of FIND”
Proposal
2020-09-01 15:31:12 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Multi-Tasking Proposal
Proposal
2020-09-01 14:18:46 -
core, Colon
The parts of execution semantics and the calling definition
Request for clarification
2020-08-31 15:40:53 -
core, Colon
The parts of execution semantics and the calling definition
Request for clarification
2020-08-31 05:24:29 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-08-30 15:10:27 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-08-30 13:19:41 -
tools
Getting execution semantics from nt
Request for clarification
2020-08-30 12:20:32 -
tools
Getting execution semantics from nt
Request for clarification
2020-08-30 10:53:29 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-08-30 10:04:46 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-08-30 09:01:01 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
Same name token for different words
Proposal
2020-08-29 20:55:48 -
tools
Getting execution semantics from nt
Request for clarification
2020-08-29 16:46:36 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-29 16:09:53 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-08-29 12:28:14 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
Same name token for different words
Proposal
2020-08-29 11:22:50 -
search
Get execution semantics from nt
Request for clarification
2020-08-29 08:14:47 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
Same name token for different words
Proposal
2020-08-28 15:12:13 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-08-28 13:08:28 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-08-28 12:29:27 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2020-08-28 08:00:31 -
case-insensitivity
Case insensitivity
Proposal
2020-08-27 18:50:37 -
locals
Recognizer for locals
Comment
2020-08-27 17:15:57 -
locals
Recognizer for locals
Comment
2020-08-27 11:09:16 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-26 23:57:01 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-26 16:36:31 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2020-08-26 14:41:54 -
locals
Recognizer for locals
Comment
2020-08-25 09:01:33 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-24 23:42:43 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-24 23:38:37 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-24 23:36:24 -
2020-forth-standards-meeting-agenda
2020 Forth Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2020-08-23 20:23:12 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-23 14:52:06 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-23 13:05:06 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-22 20:46:52 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-08-22 17:16:05 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-08-22 17:10:31 -
rationale
Annex A section and paragraph numbering has gone wrong
Request for clarification
2020-08-22 16:18:31 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-22 14:34:37 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-22 13:49:20 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-08-22 06:53:23 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2020-08-22 06:12:45 -
core, BL
ASCII version of BL
Suggested reference implementation
2020-08-21 17:08:53 -
core, BL
ASCII version of BL
Suggested reference implementation
2020-08-19 07:10:46 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2020-08-16 16:20:59 -
core, BL
An example
Example
2020-08-15 17:10:48 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2020-08-15 09:54:18 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-13 18:38:31 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-13 13:22:05 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-12 12:30:50 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-12 12:27:26 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-12 09:27:46 -
2020-forth-standards-meeting-agenda
2020 Forth Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2020-08-12 08:33:49 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-11 12:30:40 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-11 06:29:33 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-10 18:22:48 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-03 12:46:07 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-03 10:59:07 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-03 10:47:15 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-02 17:23:54 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-01 21:00:10 -
core, PARSE
What happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?
Request for clarification
2020-08-01 20:27:42 -
tools, SYNONYM
Does the wording of the rules imply that if you SYNONYM a word with the same name in the same wordlist and then 'look it up', you will get the old word?
Request for clarification
2020-07-30 13:10:12 -
tools, SYNONYM
Does the wording of the rules imply that if you SYNONYM a word with the same name in the same wordlist and then 'look it up', you will get the old word?
Request for clarification
2020-07-29 21:37:30 -
tools, SYNONYM
Does the wording of the rules imply that if you SYNONYM a word with the same name in the same wordlist and then 'look it up', you will get the old word?
Request for clarification
2020-07-27 14:00:18 -
tools, SYNONYM
Does the wording of the rules imply that if you SYNONYM a word with the same name in the same wordlist and then 'look it up', you will get the old word?
Request for clarification
2020-07-27 09:29:43 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-07-20 20:39:45 -
tools, BracketELSE
Case-sensitivity independent implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2020-07-03 08:35:50 -
Overhaul 2020: Proposals
Comment
2020-06-24 21:41:41 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
Same name token for different words
Proposal
2020-06-24 21:27:49 -
searching-for-right-bracket-doesn-t-return-
Searching for ] (right-bracket) doesn't return ]
Proposal
2020-06-23 15:16:44 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-06-23 10:02:04 -
core, SMDivREM
There is error in testing
Comment
2020-06-22 16:56:58 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-06-11 12:24:07 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2020-06-11 07:00:33 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-06-10 12:29:04 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-06-09 16:59:51 -
core, PlusLOOP
Numeric overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2020-06-08 09:49:29 -
core, PlusLOOP
Numeric overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2020-06-08 09:41:43 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-06-02 13:08:01 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-06-02 04:23:49 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-06-02 03:31:49 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-05-30 12:11:07 -
core, StoD
Word set of S>D word
Request for clarification
2020-05-30 09:36:27 -
core, StoD
Word set of S>D word
Request for clarification
2020-05-30 04:18:38 -
core, StoD
Word set of S>D word
Request for clarification
2020-05-30 04:18:16 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-05-28 08:14:52 -
tools, BracketELSE
Reference implementation does not seem to cope with changes to the stack
Request for clarification
2020-04-11 10:20:02 -
core, FILL
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2020-04-04 15:40:24 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-03-08 16:31:47 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-03-08 16:20:37 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2020-03-08 14:07:18 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-03-05 16:56:05 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-03-01 17:02:35 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2020-03-01 12:55:28 -
name-interpret-wording
NAME>INTERPRET wording
Proposal
2020-02-20 11:22:59 -
core, RECURSE
Why RECURSE is needed?
Request for clarification
2020-02-07 15:05:02 -
core, WITHIN
sample implementation that can also be interpreted
Suggested reference implementation
2020-02-07 07:26:29 -
better-wording-for-colon
Better wording for Colon
Proposal
2020-02-06 02:36:20 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-18 17:44:21 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-12 15:14:48 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-12 11:50:40 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-12 05:42:11 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-12 01:35:57 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-11 23:33:50 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-01-11 17:44:35 -
core, RECURSE
Why RECURSE is needed?
Request for clarification
2020-01-11 10:35:06 -
core, RECURSE
Why RECURSE is needed?
Request for clarification
2020-01-11 01:25:34 -
core, RECURSE
Why RECURSE is needed?
Request for clarification
2020-01-10 09:49:12 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-11-07 00:11:50 -
implement
license
Request for clarification
2019-10-30 11:17:45 -
case-sensitivity
Case sensitivity
Proposal
2019-10-08 09:49:20 -
tools, SYNONYM
Test cases for SYNONYM
Suggested Testcase
2019-10-03 12:09:02 -
tools, SYNONYM
Reference implementation of SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2019-10-03 11:33:36 -
right-justified-text-output
Right-justified text output
Proposal
2019-09-24 13:26:38 -
core, COMPILEComma
Interpretation semantics
Comment
2019-09-19 01:38:22 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2019-09-16 01:34:00 -
core, IMMEDIATE
Ambiguous conditions
Comment
2019-09-14 13:24:51 -
core, Tick
Ambiguous condition in case of undefined execution semantics
Comment
2019-09-13 07:46:12 -
core, IMMEDIATE
Ambiguous conditions
Comment
2019-09-12 15:19:24 -
block, LOAD
Getting the block contents
Request for clarification
2019-09-12 15:14:42 -
core, Tick
Ambiguous condition in case of undefined execution semantics
Comment
2019-09-12 14:17:48 -
tools, BracketIF
POSTPONE [IF]
Request for clarification
2019-09-12 14:15:22 -
core, QUIT
The reference implementation is incorrect
Suggested reference implementation
2019-09-12 12:33:37 -
core, QUIT
The reference implementation is incorrect
Suggested reference implementation
2019-09-12 12:30:06 -
remove-the-rules-of-find-
Remove the “rules of FIND”
Proposal
2019-09-12 10:28:25 -
core
GNU C RESTRICT would make sense in the standard
Suggested reference implementation
2019-09-12 09:39:57 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-09-12 08:43:39 -
tools, BracketELSE
[ELSE] without preceding [IF]
Comment
2019-09-11 17:01:16 -
case-insensitivity
Case insensitivity
Proposal
2019-09-11 16:47:28 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-11 00:40:05 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2019-09-10 12:44:39 -
case-insensitivity
Case insensitivity
Proposal
2019-09-10 11:18:38 -
case-insensitivity
Case insensitivity
Proposal
2019-09-10 11:07:51 -
case-sensitivity
Case sensitivity
Proposal
2019-09-10 10:28:39 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-09-08 08:04:49 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-09-07 16:23:36 -
core, IMMEDIATE
Ambiguous conditions
Comment
2019-09-06 16:25:33 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-06 14:16:58 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2019-09-06 13:40:58 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-06 12:17:51 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2019-09-06 11:56:34 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2019-09-06 10:55:30 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-06 10:40:38 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-06 09:45:53 -
cs-drop-revised-2019-08-22-
CS-DROP (revised 2019-08-22)
Proposal
2019-09-06 08:54:22 -
core, IMMEDIATE
Ambiguous conditions
Comment
2019-09-06 08:34:47 -
file, REFILL
Ambiguous conditions
Request for clarification
2019-09-06 08:26:50 -
cs-drop-revised-2018-08-20-
CS-DROP (revised 2018-08-20)
Proposal
2019-09-06 08:25:21 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-06 08:05:25 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-05 12:18:25 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2019-09-05 10:53:04 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2019-09-04 15:07:43 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2019-09-04 12:23:36 -
tools
description of "nt" in the standard
Request for clarification
2019-09-04 11:08:16 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2019-08-29 09:09:15 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2019-08-29 08:47:12 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2019-08-28 15:45:04 -
core, toIN
Etymology of ">IN" name
Request for clarification
2019-08-27 02:49:28 -
Search box
Comment
2019-08-25 20:12:13 -
block, LIST
Does LIST transfer data to any buffer?
Request for clarification
2019-08-13 05:46:52 -
core, toIN
Environment dependence of test cases
Request for clarification
2019-08-12 22:14:55 -
block, LIST
Does LIST transfer data to any buffer?
Request for clarification
2019-08-12 17:54:14 -
block, LIST
Does LIST transfer data to any buffer?
Request for clarification
2019-08-12 11:02:50 -
block, LOAD
Getting the block contents
Request for clarification
2019-08-12 08:10:03 -
block, LIST
Does LIST transfer data to any buffer?
Request for clarification
2019-08-12 08:06:28 -
block, LOAD
Getting the block contents
Request for clarification
2019-08-11 16:38:49 -
block, LOAD
Getting the block contents
Request for clarification
2019-08-11 16:31:06 -
block, LOAD
Getting the block contents
Request for clarification
2019-08-10 13:36:24 -
block, EVALUATE
When to set BLK to zero?
Request for clarification
2019-08-10 13:29:57 -
block, LOAD
Getting the block contents
Request for clarification
2019-08-10 11:49:44 -
core, toIN
Environment dependence of test cases
Request for clarification
2019-08-10 03:41:50 -
Session timer and preseving contributions
Example
2019-08-10 00:45:10 -
core, EVALUATE
SOURCE-ID and nesting EVALUATE
Request for clarification
2019-08-07 17:30:01 -
core
GNU C RESTRICT would make sense in the standard
Suggested reference implementation
2019-08-07 16:56:50 -
core
GNU C RESTRICT would make sense in the standard
Suggested reference implementation
2019-08-06 09:28:24 -
core, BL
Test example numeric base?
Request for clarification
2019-08-05 15:55:56 -
core, BL
Test example numeric base?
Request for clarification
2019-08-05 07:13:43 -
right-justified-text-output
Right-justified text output
Proposal
2019-08-02 11:41:11 -
right-justified-text-output
Right-justified text output
Proposal
2019-08-02 06:19:29 -
searching-for-right-bracket-doesn-t-return-
Searching for ] (right-bracket) doesn't return ]
Proposal
2019-08-01 16:08:31 -
core, BL
ASCII version of BL
Suggested reference implementation
2019-08-01 00:17:17 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-07-20 12:50:00 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-07-20 11:13:26 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2019-07-20 08:58:14 -
exception, CATCH
The specification of CATCH
Request for clarification
2019-07-20 07:09:07 -
core, Tick
Ambiguous condition in case of undefined execution semantics
Comment
2019-07-19 15:15:22 -
core, Tick
Ambiguous condition in case of undefined execution semantics
Comment
2019-07-18 16:30:50 -
core, Tick
Ambiguous condition in case of undefined execution semantics
Comment
2019-07-16 17:07:09 -
core, TO
Ambiguous conditions
Request for clarification
2019-07-15 17:36:51 -
core, TO
Ambiguous conditions
Request for clarification
2019-07-15 10:33:53 -
tools, BracketIF
POSTPONE [IF]
Request for clarification
2019-07-11 07:55:34 -
tools, BracketIF
POSTPONE [IF]
Request for clarification
2019-07-11 07:39:47 -
tools, BracketIF
POSTPONE [IF]
Request for clarification
2019-07-11 06:33:13 -
tools, BracketIF
POSTPONE [IF]
Request for clarification
2019-07-10 19:06:17 -
core, PARSE-NAME
Etymology and naming convention issue
Comment
2019-07-10 14:33:51 -
core, BUFFERColon
the confusing names
Request for clarification
2019-07-10 07:54:38 -
core, BUFFERColon
Address between runs
Request for clarification
2019-07-10 07:50:02 -
core, PARSE-NAME
Etymology and naming convention issue
Comment
2019-07-10 07:39:57 -
core, BUFFERColon
the confusing names
Request for clarification
2019-07-10 07:29:39 -
core, BUFFERColon
Address between runs
Request for clarification
2019-07-10 07:22:06 -
bl-rationale-is-wrong
BL rationale is wrong
Proposal
2019-07-09 15:56:23 -
core, BUFFERColon
the confusing names
Request for clarification
2019-07-09 14:40:02 -
revise-rationale-of-buffer-
Revise Rationale of Buffer:
Proposal
2019-07-06 15:49:22 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-06 06:22:51 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-05 15:03:21 -
notation
What is a standard program
Comment
2019-07-05 12:47:36 -
tools, NAMEtoINTERPRET
How can the zero result be used in a Standard program?
Request for clarification
2019-07-05 10:33:38 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-05 10:18:40 -
notation
What is a standard program
Comment
2019-07-05 09:10:58 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-04 20:51:22 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-04 13:04:47 -
tools, NAMEtoINTERPRET
How can the zero result be used in a Standard program?
Request for clarification
2019-07-04 10:59:39 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-04 10:45:51 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-03 16:02:12 -
core, COMPILEComma
Interpretation semantics
Comment
2019-07-03 14:44:17 -
notation
What is a standard program
Comment
2019-07-03 12:32:11 -
tools, NAMEtoINTERPRET
How can the zero result be used in a Standard program?
Request for clarification
2019-07-03 06:38:33 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-07-03 06:32:28 -
core, COMPILEComma
Interpretation semantics
Comment
2019-07-01 16:29:36 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-06-27 15:53:35 -
tools, BracketDEFINED
The case of undefined interpretation semantics
Request for clarification
2019-06-27 07:49:44 -
core, COMPILEComma
Interpretation semantics
Comment
2019-06-27 07:25:47 -
string, UNESCAPE
Etymology and naming issue
Request for clarification
2019-06-26 09:09:02 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2019-06-23 07:18:28 -
core, EXIT
execution of exit
Request for clarification
2019-06-23 06:56:25 -
core, EXIT
execution of exit
Request for clarification
2019-06-21 14:04:19 -
Session timer and preseving contributions
Example
2019-06-21 11:28:34 -
core, EXIT
execution of exit
Request for clarification
2019-06-21 06:06:18 -
core, EXIT
execution of exit
Request for clarification
2019-06-20 16:09:58 -
notation
Terminology and wording regarding "dictionary"
Request for clarification
2019-06-05 21:22:51 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2019-06-05 01:38:16 -
core, PlusLOOP
Numeric overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2019-05-22 18:30:57 -
core, Plus
Overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2019-05-22 07:24:15 -
core, PlusLOOP
Numeric overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2019-05-21 23:27:07 -
core, ACCEPT
Receiving a zero-length string
Request for clarification
2019-05-21 07:53:10 -
core, PlusLOOP
Numeric overflow/underflow
Request for clarification
2019-05-21 05:54:21 -
core, ACCEPT
Receiving a zero-length string
Request for clarification
2019-05-21 05:28:43 -
core, CHAR
Behavior when no text found
Comment
2019-05-21 02:36:47 -
core, CHAR
Behavior when no text found
Comment
2019-05-20 16:54:34 -
core, CHAR
Behavior when no text found
Comment
2019-05-20 14:53:40 -
core, CHAR
Behavior when no text found
Comment
2019-05-20 07:37:31 -
core, ACCEPT
Behavior at end of line and end of data
Request for clarification
2019-05-14 09:41:25 -
core, ACCEPT
Behavior at end of line and end of data
Request for clarification
2019-05-13 07:04:41 -
core, ACCEPT
Behavior at end of line and end of data
Request for clarification
2019-05-12 21:04:32 -
core, ACCEPT
Behavior at end of line and end of data
Request for clarification
2019-05-12 06:37:04 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2019-04-14 06:33:14 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2019-04-14 06:12:35 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2019-04-13 07:49:18 -
tools, BracketELSE
[if] and [else] parse white space - including comments
Request for clarification
2019-02-16 11:49:51 -
tools, BracketELSE
[if] and [else] parse white space - including comments
Request for clarification
2019-02-16 07:59:01 -
tools, BracketELSE
[if] and [else] parse white space - including comments
Request for clarification
2019-02-15 18:51:47 -
Need lock on already posted comments
Example
2018-10-11 18:52:13 -
Need lock on already posted comments
Example
2018-10-11 18:41:22 -
core, TO
Should TO be findable?
Request for clarification
2018-10-08 10:55:50 -
search, ALSO
ALSO without VOCABULARY
Request for clarification
2018-09-24 09:28:53 -
core, TO
Should TO be findable?
Request for clarification
2018-09-23 06:23:10 -
search, ALSO
ALSO without VOCABULARY
Request for clarification
2018-09-23 06:05:49 -
search, ALSO
ALSO without VOCABULARY
Request for clarification
2018-09-22 10:59:45 -
search, ALSO
ALSO without VOCABULARY
Request for clarification
2018-09-21 06:44:13 -
search, ALSO
ALSO without VOCABULARY
Request for clarification
2018-09-19 13:50:16 -
search, ALSO
ALSO without VOCABULARY
Request for clarification
2018-09-19 08:22:17 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Multi-Tasking Proposal
Proposal
2018-09-12 23:43:35 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Multi-Tasking Proposal
Proposal
2018-09-12 23:27:55 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Multi-Tasking Proposal
Proposal
2018-09-12 10:04:26 -
s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-
S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)
Proposal
2018-08-22 10:31:33 -
s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-
S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)
Proposal
2018-08-21 18:51:42 -
s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-
S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)
Proposal
2018-08-21 14:13:45 -
s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-
S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)
Proposal
2018-08-20 10:52:29 -
s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-
S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)
Proposal
2018-08-19 09:34:36 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-08-18 08:31:19 -
s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-
S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)
Proposal
2018-08-18 08:23:33 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-08-17 07:52:57 -
core, RECURSE
proposal: recurse' to complement recurse
Comment
2018-08-16 11:32:01 -
core, RECURSE
proposal: recurse' to complement recurse
Comment
2018-08-16 11:23:47 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-08-16 11:10:39 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-08-15 10:38:39 -
exception-locals
EXCEPTION LOCALs
Proposal
2018-08-15 10:12:05 -
let-us-adopt-the-gerry-jackson-test-suite-as-part-of-forth-200x
Let us adopt the Gerry Jackson test suite as part of Forth 200x
Proposal
2018-07-16 22:45:40 -
let-us-adopt-the-gerry-jackson-test-suite-as-part-of-forth-200x
Let us adopt the Gerry Jackson test suite as part of Forth 200x
Proposal
2018-07-14 06:32:34 -
let-us-adopt-the-gerry-jackson-test-suite-as-part-of-forth-200x
Let us adopt the Gerry Jackson test suite as part of Forth 200x
Proposal
2018-07-13 16:25:47 -
let-us-adopt-the-gerry-jackson-test-suite-as-part-of-forth-200x
Let us adopt the Gerry Jackson test suite as part of Forth 200x
Proposal
2018-07-11 08:51:48 -
core, HOLDS
Specification of HOLDS is ambiguous
Comment
2018-06-28 11:07:34 -
core, HOLDS
Specification of HOLDS is ambiguous
Comment
2018-06-27 16:02:07 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-18 13:51:04 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-06-17 13:28:27 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-17 12:56:01 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-17 06:33:56 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-16 18:21:15 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-16 13:07:35 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-16 08:44:38 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-15 17:39:24 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-14 16:30:36 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-14 16:23:09 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-13 20:19:59 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-13 20:18:38 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-11 13:24:32 -
tools, BracketELSE
[ELSE] without preceding [IF]
Comment
2018-06-10 19:02:54 -
How to change email address
Request for clarification
2018-06-09 06:14:16 -
Need lock on already posted comments
Example
2018-06-08 14:37:12 -
Need lock on already posted comments
Example
2018-06-08 14:32:15 -
Need lock on already posted comments
Example
2018-06-08 14:32:03 -
How to change email address
Request for clarification
2018-06-08 14:04:33 -
Need lock on already posted comments
Example
2018-06-08 13:55:28 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-08 12:18:02 -
tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-
Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)
Proposal
2018-06-08 12:03:52 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-07 23:47:38 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-07 19:43:58 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-07 13:46:17 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-07 09:50:11 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-06-06 22:47:43 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-05-31 08:20:43 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-31 07:46:08 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-05-30 20:05:24 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-30 15:14:18 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-30 07:17:41 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-30 06:49:26 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-29 11:28:32 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-29 10:46:22 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-29 10:22:53 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-27 21:07:04 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-27 13:03:37 -
find-name
find-name
Proposal
2018-05-27 08:48:20 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-26 18:11:13 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-25 17:42:06 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-05-25 16:04:30 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-25 14:37:46 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-25 06:35:45 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-24 17:13:21 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-05-24 16:54:57 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-24 16:11:53 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-24 12:16:42 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-24 12:16:24 -
tools, NAMEtoCOMPILE
NAME>COMPILE result
Comment
2018-05-24 10:54:29 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-24 07:37:08 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2018-05-23 22:09:24 -
tools, BracketELSE
[ELSE] without preceding [IF]
Comment
2018-05-15 14:49:07 -
tools, BracketELSE
[ELSE] without preceding [IF]
Comment
2018-05-15 08:09:08 -
tools, BracketELSE
[ELSE] without preceding [IF]
Comment
2018-05-14 23:43:04 -
Session timer and preseving contributions
Example
2018-04-04 20:01:33 -
core, INVERT
Successful test cases would be good
Suggested Testcase
2018-03-02 10:40:09 -
Standard 2012 as slightly reduced version - but as Part of the Forth Bookshelf
Suggested reference implementation
2018-03-02 07:37:26 -
core, INVERT
Successful test cases would be good
Suggested Testcase
2018-03-02 05:31:58 -
Standard 2012 as slightly reduced version - but as Part of the Forth Bookshelf
Suggested reference implementation
2018-02-27 07:56:28 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 19:26:17 -
core, FILL
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 19:18:53 -
core, CComma
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 19:09:21 -
core, CComma
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 18:42:05 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 16:12:31 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 16:12:00 -
core, FILL
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 16:03:12 -
core, BracketTick
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 15:54:04 -
core, HEX
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 15:52:01 -
core, BracketCHAR
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 15:51:30 -
core, TwoSWAP
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 15:43:39 -
core, FILL
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-08 15:41:47 -
core, BracketTick
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-07 18:05:20 -
core, BracketCHAR
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2018-01-07 18:03:35 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2017-11-01 14:08:50 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2017-10-31 12:26:22 -
bl-rationale-is-wrong
BL rationale is wrong
Proposal
2017-10-25 13:15:11 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2017-09-25 14:04:02 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2017-09-08 11:48:24 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2017-09-08 09:07:15 -
string, SUBSTITUTE
Case sensitivity
Request for clarification
2017-07-11 15:07:46 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2017-04-19 16:40:44 -
core-ext-s-should-reference-file-ext-s-
Core-ext S\" should reference File-ext S\"
Proposal
2017-04-19 16:35:24 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2017-04-19 16:26:29 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2017-04-18 02:35:54 -
core-ext-s-should-reference-file-ext-s-
Core-ext S\" should reference File-ext S\"
Proposal
2017-04-17 22:31:57 -
core-ext-s-should-reference-file-ext-s-
Core-ext S\" should reference File-ext S\"
Proposal
2017-04-17 14:43:17 -
core-ext-s-should-reference-file-ext-s-
Core-ext S\" should reference File-ext S\"
Proposal
2017-04-17 13:40:27 -
core-ext-s-should-reference-file-ext-s-
Core-ext S\" should reference File-ext S\"
Proposal
2017-04-16 21:54:19 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2017-04-16 07:54:38 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2017-04-15 19:03:39 -
xchar, X-SIZE
UTF-8 and Unicode codepoint maximum
Request for clarification
2017-02-15 01:27:46 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-31 22:02:53 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-31 20:36:48 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2016-12-31 11:57:29 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2016-12-31 11:41:05 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2016-12-23 00:47:30 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2016-12-22 18:42:35 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2016-12-22 09:44:54 -
implementations-requiring-both-32-bit-single-floats-and-64-bit-double-floats-
Implementations requiring BOTH 32 bit single floats and 64 bit double floats.
Proposal
2016-12-22 01:09:07 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-14 20:35:29 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-14 01:19:16 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-13 20:21:46 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-13 17:43:06 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-13 13:23:49 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-13 12:10:12 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-12-13 11:56:28 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-13 11:09:34 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-13 10:57:57 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-13 01:15:24 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-12 20:20:37 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-12-12 18:12:30 -
directory-experiemental-proposal
Directory experiemental proposal
Proposal
2016-12-12 18:07:49 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-11 21:17:31 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-11 20:42:18 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-11 20:32:42 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-12-10 17:12:39 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-12-10 11:26:27 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-12-10 10:25:25 -
float
Mistake in the specification of significand?
Example
2016-12-09 11:19:56 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-09 11:10:06 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-09 11:00:57 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-09 08:57:19 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-08 14:33:37 -
tools, SYNONYM
Incomplete specification of SYNONYM
Comment
2016-12-08 09:43:19 -
tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLIST
TRAVERSE-WORDLIST is in the wrong word set
Comment
2016-12-08 09:38:00 -
tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLIST
TRAVERSE-WORDLIST is in the wrong word set
Comment
2016-11-22 10:29:50 -
core, ACCEPT
Source of a string
Request for clarification
2016-10-31 10:45:37 -
core, ACCEPT
Source of a string
Request for clarification
2016-10-01 18:41:58 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-09-24 17:44:05 -
core, SPACES
Obvious implementation
Example
2016-09-24 17:34:30 -
defer-this-not-
DEFER this not :-)
Proposal
2016-09-16 10:55:30 -
defer-this-not-
DEFER this not :-)
Proposal
2016-09-15 13:47:11 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-09-11 17:04:33 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-09-08 14:22:36 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-22 17:49:42 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-22 12:39:33 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-21 17:44:50 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-21 10:24:01 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-20 03:50:08 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-19 14:08:36 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-19 13:52:09 -
wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easier
WLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easier
Proposal
2016-06-19 13:26:04 -
core, UNLOOP
Another use of UNLOOP
Suggested Testcase
2016-05-24 13:35:32 -
tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLIST
TRAVERSE-WORDLIST is in the wrong word set
Comment
2016-05-24 13:27:38 -
core, EVALUATE
Check for evaluate SOURCE is the string itself, not a copy
Suggested Testcase
2016-05-22 20:23:13 -
core, UNLOOP
Another use of UNLOOP
Suggested Testcase
2016-05-17 12:39:26 -
core, UNLOOP
Another use of UNLOOP
Suggested Testcase
2016-05-17 07:39:42 -
usage
3.3.3.5 Input buffer: "A program shall not write into the input buffer."
Comment
2016-03-21 13:26:08 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2016-02-05 18:31:42 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2016-01-15 20:43:41 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2016-01-14 15:29:49 -
core, RECURSE
proposal: recurse' to complement recurse
Comment
2016-01-06 23:00:24 -
core, Tick
Request for clarification
2016-01-05 14:03:33 -
core, RECURSE
proposal: recurse' to complement recurse
Comment
2015-12-30 19:14:02 -
core, RECURSE
proposal: recurse' to complement recurse
Comment
2015-12-15 15:52:07 -
core, RECURSE
proposal: recurse' to complement recurse
Comment
2015-12-15 13:19:28 -
core, BL
ASCII version of BL
Suggested reference implementation
2015-12-04 17:07:31 -
core, BL
ASCII version of BL
Suggested reference implementation
2015-11-27 19:22:55 -
core, BL
ASCII version of BL
Suggested reference implementation
2015-11-27 19:18:57
