Contributions
These are all contributions and replies sorted latest first (Markdown version).
Contributions:
Replies:
-
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
[r757] Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-09 16:15:06 -
core, SOURCE
[r756] Relationship to block set
Example
2021-09-09 14:51:39 -
usage
[r755] Data type for strings
Comment
2021-09-09 14:42:52 -
multi-tasking-proposal
[r754] Query re status; and minor comments
Comment
2021-09-09 14:40:18 -
core, TwoStore
[r753] Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2021-09-09 14:25:25 -
core, num
[r752] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-09-09 14:13:40 -
exception, THROW
[r751] Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-09-09 14:12:06 -
file, Sq
[r750] Implementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanism
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 14:11:18 -
memory, ALLOCATE
[r749] write-cell-mem undefined
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 13:46:33 -
core, POSTPONE
[r748] GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 13:44:53 -
place-place
[r747] PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-09 11:06:55 -
place-place
[r746] PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-09 08:42:32 -
place-place
[r745] PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-08 21:15:27 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
[r744] Same name token for different words
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:43:45 -
clarify-find
[r743] Clarify FIND
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:37:22 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
[r742] Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:00:46 -
core, Tick
[r741] Is Tick Immediate?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:52:12 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r740] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:44:39 -
block, BLOCK
[r739] Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:30:28 -
core, COUNT
[r738] Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:28:20 -
usage
[r737] Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:20:31 -
core, LEAVE
[r736] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:14:00 -
core, ALLOT
[r735] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:04:25 -
string, COMPARE
[r734] How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:57:55 -
string, COMPARE
[r733] How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:57:22 -
right-bracket
[r732] Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:48:46 -
file, Sq
[r731] Implementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanism
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:39:19 -
core, Bracket
[r730] Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:18:38 -
interpretation-semantic-for-locals-are-undefined
[r729] Interpretation semantic for locals are undefined
Proposal
2021-09-07 14:22:37 -
2021-standards-meeting-agenda
[r728] 2021 Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2021-09-07 06:32:09 -
string, CMOVE
[r727] CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-04 13:05:38 -
string, CMOVE
[r726] CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-04 07:48:45 -
string, CMOVE
[r725] CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 11:12:27 -
string, CMOVE
[r724] CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 09:26:00 -
string, CMOVE
[r723] CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 03:30:03 -
string, CMOVE
[r722] CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-02 16:47:00 -
string, CMOVE
[r721] CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-02 15:39:16 -
usage
[r720] Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-09-01 13:33:38 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
[r719] Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-09-01 11:22:26 -
place-place
[r718] PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-01 10:15:24 -
core, Bracket
[r717] Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-08-21 17:38:45 -
core, WHILE
[r716] There is an error in testing
Comment
2021-08-21 09:48:45 -
core, WHILE
[r715] There is an error in testing
Comment
2021-08-20 21:56:52 -
core, Bracket
[r714] Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-08-20 11:25:13 -
core, DEPTH
[r713] More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-08-19 13:34:23 -
core, DEPTH
[r712] More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-08-19 02:27:37 -
place-place
[r711] PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-07-30 13:47:38 -
core, Bracket
[r710] Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-19 17:20:10 -
core, Bracket
[r709] Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-19 08:23:12 -
core, Bracket
[r708] Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-18 12:21:20 -
tools, SYNONYM
[r707] Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-07-07 12:42:12 -
core, BUFFERColon
[r706] Address between runs
Request for clarification
2021-07-07 12:31:02 -
core, POSTPONE
[r705] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-07-05 14:40:42 -
core, POSTPONE
[r704] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-07-03 17:32:21 -
tools, SYNONYM
[r703] Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-07-01 10:37:45 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
[r702] The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2021-06-28 08:12:15 -
double, TwoVALUE
[r701] Mistake in implementation?
Comment
2021-06-28 07:00:03 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
[r700] The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2021-06-24 16:37:28 -
tools, SYNONYM
[r699] Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-06-12 13:43:19 -
tools, SYNONYM
[r698] Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-06-12 13:32:48 -
string, DivSTRING
[r697] Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-24 14:56:22 -
string, DivSTRING
[r696] Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-22 08:21:49 -
string, DivSTRING
[r695] Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-21 22:33:11 -
core, POSTPONE
[r694] Portable implementation for POSTPONE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-15 21:09:40 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
[r693] Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2021-05-15 18:22:00 -
double, DtoS
[r692] Inaccurate Test Cases?
Suggested Testcase
2021-05-15 10:21:56 -
right-bracket
[r691] Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-05-09 12:27:46 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r690] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 22:10:06 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r689] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 20:17:28 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r688] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 17:53:36 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r687] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 17:14:50 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r686] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 14:54:39 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r685] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 11:10:38 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r684] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 11:10:14 -
right-bracket
[r683] Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 07:49:42 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
[r682] Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-05-06 13:44:41 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
[r681] Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-05-06 11:39:03 -
core, POSTPONE
[r680] Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2021-05-06 08:00:44 -
string, COMPARE
[r679] How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-05-02 15:10:25 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
[r678] Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-02 12:32:34 -
string, COMPARE
[r677] How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-04-30 17:16:31 -
exception, THROW
[r676] Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-28 02:09:40 -
core, COMPILEComma
[r675] Interpretation semantics
Comment
2021-04-27 14:24:58 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
[r674] Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-23 16:38:42 -
exception, THROW
[r673] Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-23 07:44:55 -
exception, THROW
[r672] Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-22 16:39:54 -
core, ALLOT
[r671] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-22 02:03:15 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
[r670] How to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]
Comment
2021-04-21 14:38:53 -
core, ALLOT
[r669] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-20 21:06:38 -
exception, THROW
[r668] Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-20 14:20:32 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
[r667] Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 21:28:53 -
core, ALLOT
[r666] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 20:28:10 -
core, ALLOT
[r665] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 20:16:56 -
core, ALLOT
[r664] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 18:24:43 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r663] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2021-04-19 17:05:40 -
usage
[r662] Data type for strings
Comment
2021-04-19 12:33:49 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
[r661] Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 12:15:56 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
[r660] Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 11:39:14 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
[r659] Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-19 11:03:24 -
core, num
[r658] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 07:08:09 -
core, ALLOT
[r657] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 06:50:23 -
core, num
[r656] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 06:30:23 -
core, num
[r655] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 04:55:23 -
core, ALLOT
[r654] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 04:51:00 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r653] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2021-04-19 04:21:03 -
core, ALLOT
[r652] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 04:09:12 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
[r651] Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-18 16:04:18 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
[r650] Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-18 15:43:13 -
core, ALLOT
[r649] ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-18 10:10:31 -
core, num
[r648] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-18 08:23:54 -
core, STATE
[r647] Advantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 17:49:29 -
core, DEFERStore
[r646] Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 17:34:37 -
core, TO
[r645] What is the intent, purpose or meaning of TO?
Example
2021-04-17 16:14:14 -
core, STATE
[r644] Advantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 15:08:48 -
core, num
[r643] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-17 09:23:48 -
reference-implementations-are-not-normative
[r642] Reference implementations are not normative
Proposal
2021-04-15 12:47:32 -
core, DEFERStore
[r641] Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-15 10:29:49 -
core, DEFERStore
[r640] Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-15 07:34:17 -
core, LEAVE
[r639] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-10 09:14:58 -
core, LEAVE
[r638] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-08 11:25:35 -
core, LEAVE
[r637] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 12:53:15 -
core, LEAVE
[r636] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 10:17:39 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
[r635] EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-07 10:09:00 -
core, LEAVE
[r634] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 08:16:04 -
core, LEAVE
[r633] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-06 11:54:14 -
core, LEAVE
[r632] Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-06 06:23:08 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
[r631] EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 11:10:42 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
[r630] EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 10:12:01 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
[r629] EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 02:08:59 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
[r628] EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 15:57:41 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
[r627] EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 15:15:25 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
[r626] EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 01:53:23 -
core, TYPE
[r625] Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-04-03 08:37:52 -
usage
[r624] Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-03-30 18:43:47 -
core, TwoOVER
[r623] Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-03-26 19:57:04 -
core, num
[r622] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-03-14 18:43:52 -
core, num
[r621] Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-03-14 02:01:49 -
core, num
[r620] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 22:40:05 -
core, num
[r619] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 08:59:39 -
core, COUNT
[r618] Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 08:44:13 -
core, num
[r617] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 02:12:02 -
core, COUNT
[r616] Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-12 16:32:58 -
core, COUNT
[r615] Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-12 07:48:49 -
core, POSTPONE
[r614] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-03-09 19:11:06 -
core, ENDCASE
[r613] Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-09 16:02:58 -
core, ENDCASE
[r612] Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-08 21:21:49 -
block, BLOCK
[r611] Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 11:03:41 -
core, num
[r610] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 08:31:05 -
core, num
[r609] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 05:18:27 -
core, ENDCASE
[r608] Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-06 16:47:27 -
core, ENDCASE
[r607] Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-03 04:39:08 -
core, ENDCASE
[r606] Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-03 03:53:14 -
core, HOLDS
[r605] Specification of HOLDS is ambiguous
Comment
2021-02-19 06:40:29 -
core, num
[r604] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-05 08:15:33 -
core, num
[r603] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-05 08:12:42 -
core, num
[r602] Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-02 10:04:10 -
core, POSTPONE
[r601] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-24 10:39:29 -
core, POSTPONE
[r600] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-24 04:43:29 -
core, POSTPONE
[r599] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-23 12:56:09 -
core, Tick
[r598] Is Tick Immediate?
Request for clarification
2021-01-23 09:33:09 -
locals, bColon
[r597] Run-Time Section is Missing Words
Comment
2021-01-23 09:24:39 -
core, POSTPONE
[r596] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-23 01:36:26 -
core, TYPE
[r595] Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-01-22 20:48:21 -
core, POSTPONE
[r594] Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-22 10:39:10 -
core, POSTPONE
[r593] GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-01-22 02:42:43 -
core, POSTPONE
[r592] GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-01-21 16:20:49 -
core, SOURCE
[r591] Relationship to block set
Example
2021-01-14 17:15:18 -
memory, ALLOCATE
[r590] write-cell-mem undefined
Request for clarification
2021-01-13 08:41:17 -
core, SOURCE
[r589] Relationship to block set
Example
2021-01-07 01:57:20 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
[r588] Obsoleted - by what?
Request for clarification
2021-01-06 10:06:23 -
core, SOURCE
[r587] Relationship to block set
Example
2020-12-29 07:27:48 -
core, SOURCE-ID
[r586] Should this reference the optional word sets where SOURCE-ID is changed
Example
2020-12-29 07:14:19 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
[r585] XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-23 18:24:58 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
[r584] XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-09 13:58:40 -
core, TwoStore
[r583] Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2020-12-05 10:01:24 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
[r582] XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-05 09:31:00 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
[r581] XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-02 15:05:55 -
core, TwoStore
[r580] Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2020-12-02 11:42:20 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
[r579] XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-01 11:54:46 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
[r578] XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-11-28 19:19:56 -
usage
[r577] Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 14:07:05 -
usage
[r576] Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 11:48:07 -
usage
[r575] Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 11:28:08 -
usage
[r574] Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 09:06:42 -
usage
[r573] Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 01:21:15 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r572] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-11-20 14:25:42 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r571] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-11-19 19:58:48 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
[r570] Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2020-11-17 15:48:41 -
recognizer
[r569] Recognizer
Proposal
2020-11-17 09:40:35 -
search, DEFINITIONS
[r568] off-by-one error in reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2020-11-14 14:51:43 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
[r567] Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2020-10-31 21:19:03 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
[r566] Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2020-10-31 17:24:02 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r565] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-10-29 00:48:42 -
f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variables
[r564] F>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variables
Proposal
2020-10-22 03:09:51 -
testsuite
[r563] Please fix word spelling in F.1 second paragraph second word.
Suggested reference implementation
2020-09-26 17:10:03 -
core, DEFER
[r562] Defer Implementation
Comment
2020-09-26 16:59:35 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
[r561] Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-09-26 16:16:33 -
name-interpret-wording
[r560] NAME>INTERPRET wording
Proposal
2020-09-25 18:37:37 -
better-wording-for-colon
[r559] Better wording for Colon
Proposal
2020-09-25 18:13:57 -
input-values-other-than-true-and-false
[r558] Input values other than true and false
Proposal
2020-09-25 18:05:08 -
string, REPLACES
[r557] wording - "current region" term is undefined
Comment
2020-09-25 17:57:53 -
licence-to-use-reference-implementations
[r556] Licence to use reference implementations
Proposal
2020-09-25 17:46:06 -
vocabulary
[r555] VOCABULARY
Proposal
2020-09-25 17:16:55 -
tools, SYNONYM
[r554] Reference implementation of SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2020-09-25 17:11:24 -
core, IMMEDIATE
[r553] Ambiguous conditions
Comment
2020-09-25 16:40:00 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
[r552] Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-22 17:05:31 -
2020-forth-standards-meeting-agenda
[r551] 2020 Forth Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2020-09-22 16:01:25 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
[r550] Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-22 09:44:37 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
[r549] Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-22 00:00:44 -
recognizer
[r548] Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-21 16:55:37 -
recognizer
[r547] Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-21 13:23:29 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
[r546] OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-09-20 17:35:38 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r545] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-19 12:24:09 -
core, MARKER
[r544] Extending MARKER
Request for clarification
2020-09-17 05:34:07 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
[r543] Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-16 20:25:35 -
wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-locals
[r542] Wording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for locals
Proposal
2020-09-16 17:17:50 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r541] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-16 14:26:03 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r540] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-15 10:04:01 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r539] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-14 21:33:55 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
[r538] An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 13:25:16 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
[r537] An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 13:21:26 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
[r536] An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 09:20:04 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
[r535] An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-14 09:12:42 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
[r534] Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-13 16:19:15 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
[r533] Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-13 06:49:49 -
traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitions
[r532] Traverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitions
Proposal
2020-09-12 22:51:48 -
nestable-recognizer-sequences
[r531] Nestable Recognizer Sequences
Proposal
2020-09-12 13:12:35 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r530] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-12 07:46:25 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r529] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 21:55:54 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r528] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 17:45:12 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r527] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 12:23:36 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r526] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 04:10:31 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r525] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-11 03:46:35 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r524] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-10 21:36:12 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
[r523] OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-09-10 15:43:15 -
optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-set
[r522] OPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SET
Proposal
2020-09-10 12:50:53 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r521] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-09 08:25:37 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r520] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-09 08:13:21 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r519] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 20:14:11 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r518] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 16:45:16 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r517] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 14:48:20 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r516] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 11:33:30 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r515] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 08:39:23 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r514] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-08 08:36:42 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r513] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 18:02:52 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
[r512] An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-07 17:41:42 -
an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposal
[r511] An alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposal
Proposal
2020-09-07 17:29:43 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r510] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 17:12:08 -
recognizer
[r509] Recognizer
Proposal
2020-09-07 16:50:59 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
[r508] minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-09-07 15:58:29
