Contributions
These are all contributions and replies sorted latest first (Markdown version).
Contributions:
Replies:
-
core, HEX
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2022-04-05 15:03:31 -
core, MTimes
Double>
Request for clarification
2022-04-05 12:53:09 -
core, MTimes
Double>
Request for clarification
2022-04-05 07:21:20 -
core, UMTimes
Question about final test
Request for clarification
2022-04-03 06:34:41 -
search, FORTH-WORDLIST
inconsistent naming
Request for clarification
2022-03-19 07:11:56 -
search, FORTH-WORDLIST
inconsistent naming
Request for clarification
2022-03-18 19:08:01 -
search, FORTH-WORDLIST
inconsistent naming
Request for clarification
2022-03-18 18:20:35 -
locals
Contradiction With do-loops
Request for clarification
2022-03-11 19:15:04 -
locals
Contradiction With do-loops
Request for clarification
2022-03-11 09:49:00 -
locals
Accessing Remaining Data Stack?
Request for clarification
2022-03-09 08:35:03 -
locals
Accessing Remaining Data Stack?
Request for clarification
2022-03-09 08:16:15 -
locals
Contradiction With do-loops
Request for clarification
2022-03-09 07:37:08 -
core, Cq
c-addr used in stack diagrams
Request for clarification
2022-03-07 12:45:03 -
core, Cq
c-addr used in stack diagrams
Request for clarification
2022-03-07 09:57:22 -
double, DZeroEqual
Using a . suffix to specify a double
Comment
2022-03-06 07:21:10 -
core, p
"(" typo in a testcase
Comment
2022-03-01 08:24:31 -
core, POSTPONE
I suggest to complete the test
Comment
2022-02-28 16:06:39 -
testsuite
many tests appear to only assess interpretation semantics of test subjects
Suggested Testcase
2022-02-28 14:52:55 -
core, p
"(" typo in a testcase
Comment
2022-02-28 14:17:40 -
core, WHILE
There is an error in testing
Comment
2022-02-22 12:28:19 -
better-wording-for-data-field-term
Better wording for "data field" term
Proposal
2022-02-21 14:32:04 -
specify-that-0-throw-pops-the-0
Specify that 0 THROW pops the 0
Proposal
2022-02-21 13:33:08 -
specify-that-0-throw-pops-the-0
Specify that 0 THROW pops the 0
Proposal
2022-02-19 19:04:45 -
agenda-forth-200x-interim-meeting-2020-02-18t14-00z
Agenda Forth-200x interim Meeting 2020-02-18T14:00Z
Proposal
2022-02-19 16:28:44 -
core, TwoSWAP
Implement with ROT
Suggested reference implementation
2022-02-18 19:07:00 -
better-wording-for-data-field-term
Better wording for "data field" term
Proposal
2022-02-18 19:03:45 -
better-wording-for-glossary-notation-
Better wording for "Glossary notation"
Proposal
2022-02-18 18:41:48 -
core, EVALUATE
New Line characters in a string passed to EVALUATE
Example
2022-02-18 14:41:34 -
core, Sq
Forth Programmer's Handbook
Example
2022-02-18 14:33:12 -
agenda-forth-200x-interim-meeting-2020-02-18t14-00z
Agenda Forth-200x interim Meeting 2020-02-18T14:00Z
Proposal
2022-02-15 20:02:09 -
core, Sq
Forth Programmer's Handbook
Example
2022-02-13 17:27:28 -
core, Sq
Forth Programmer's Handbook
Example
2022-02-12 18:39:03 -
core, Sq
Forth Programmer's Handbook
Example
2022-02-12 18:23:04 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-12-18 22:53:47 -
core, EVALUATE
New Line characters in a string passed to EVALUATE
Example
2021-11-23 08:10:12 -
core, EVALUATE
New Line characters in a string passed to EVALUATE
Example
2021-11-22 22:47:15 -
core, POSTPONE
Portable implementation for POSTPONE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-11-11 06:25:12 -
core, POSTPONE
Portable implementation for POSTPONE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-11-11 01:52:55 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-11-10 18:36:28 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-16 01:02:23 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-09-16 00:20:38 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-14 11:38:47 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-13 17:27:31 -
wording-change-for-compile-harmonization-with-terms
Wording change for "COMPILE,": harmonization with terms
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:12:42 -
reference-implementations-are-not-normative
Reference implementations are not normative
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:06:10 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:04:42 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-13 17:02:04 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-13 08:55:46 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-12 15:31:01 -
exception, THROW
THROW: text doesn't match implementation example
Comment
2021-09-11 12:29:27 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
How to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]
Comment
2021-09-11 12:04:39 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-09-11 11:47:00 -
core, CComma
Additional test for UTF-16
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-11 11:35:15 -
double, DtoS
Inaccurate Test Cases?
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-11 11:27:05 -
core, DEPTH
More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-09-11 11:05:05 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-11 08:02:18 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-10 07:57:06 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-09 21:10:24 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-09 16:24:16 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2
Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2
Proposal
2021-09-09 16:15:06 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2021-09-09 14:51:39 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2021-09-09 14:42:52 -
multi-tasking-proposal
Query re status; and minor comments
Comment
2021-09-09 14:40:18 -
core, TwoStore
Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2021-09-09 14:25:25 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-09-09 14:13:40 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-09-09 14:12:06 -
file, Sq
Implementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanism
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 14:11:18 -
memory, ALLOCATE
write-cell-mem undefined
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 13:46:33 -
core, POSTPONE
GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-09-09 13:44:53 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-09 11:06:55 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-09 08:42:32 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-08 21:15:27 -
same-name-token-for-different-words
Same name token for different words
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:43:45 -
clarify-find
Clarify FIND
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:37:22 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2021-09-08 18:00:46 -
core, Tick
Is Tick Immediate?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:52:12 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:44:39 -
block, BLOCK
Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:30:28 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:28:20 -
usage
Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:20:31 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:14:00 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 17:04:25 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:57:55 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:57:22 -
right-bracket
Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:48:46 -
file, Sq
Implementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanism
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:39:19 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-09-08 16:18:38 -
interpretation-semantic-for-locals-are-undefined
Interpretation semantic for locals are undefined
Proposal
2021-09-07 14:22:37 -
2021-standards-meeting-agenda
2021 Standards meeting agenda
Proposal
2021-09-07 06:32:09 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-04 13:05:38 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-04 07:48:45 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 11:12:27 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 09:26:00 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-03 03:30:03 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-02 16:47:00 -
string, CMOVE
CMOVE implementation based on MOVE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-09-02 15:39:16 -
usage
Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-09-01 13:33:38 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-09-01 11:22:26 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-09-01 10:15:24 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-08-21 17:38:45 -
core, WHILE
There is an error in testing
Comment
2021-08-21 09:48:45 -
core, WHILE
There is an error in testing
Comment
2021-08-20 21:56:52 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-08-20 11:25:13 -
core, DEPTH
More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-08-19 13:34:23 -
core, DEPTH
More general Testcase
Suggested Testcase
2021-08-19 02:27:37 -
place-place
PLACE +PLACE
Proposal
2021-07-30 13:47:38 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-19 17:20:10 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-19 08:23:12 -
core, Bracket
Why "[" is specified using immediacy?
Request for clarification
2021-07-18 12:21:20 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-07-07 12:42:12 -
core, BUFFERColon
Address between runs
Request for clarification
2021-07-07 12:31:02 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-07-05 14:40:42 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-07-03 17:32:21 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-07-01 10:37:45 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2021-06-28 08:12:15 -
double, TwoVALUE
Mistake in implementation?
Comment
2021-06-28 07:00:03 -
the-value-of-state-should-be-restored
The value of STATE should be restored
Proposal
2021-06-24 16:37:28 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-06-12 13:43:19 -
tools, SYNONYM
Portable implementation for SYNONYM
Suggested reference implementation
2021-06-12 13:32:48 -
string, DivSTRING
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-24 14:56:22 -
string, DivSTRING
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-22 08:21:49 -
string, DivSTRING
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-21 22:33:11 -
core, POSTPONE
Portable implementation for POSTPONE
Suggested reference implementation
2021-05-15 21:09:40 -
recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020
Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020
Proposal
2021-05-15 18:22:00 -
double, DtoS
Inaccurate Test Cases?
Suggested Testcase
2021-05-15 10:21:56 -
right-bracket
Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-05-09 12:27:46 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 22:10:06 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 20:17:28 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 17:53:36 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 17:14:50 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 14:54:39 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 11:10:38 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 11:10:14 -
right-bracket
Web site problem?
Request for clarification
2021-05-07 07:49:42 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-05-06 13:44:41 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-05-06 11:39:03 -
core, POSTPONE
Ambiguous condition could be removed
Comment
2021-05-06 08:00:44 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-05-02 15:10:25 -
xchar, XC-WIDTH
Return value of XC-WIDTH for control characters
Request for clarification
2021-05-02 12:32:34 -
string, COMPARE
How many cells can be compared ? Must have any limit ?
Request for clarification
2021-04-30 17:16:31 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-28 02:09:40 -
core, COMPILEComma
Interpretation semantics
Comment
2021-04-27 14:24:58 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-23 16:38:42 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-23 07:44:55 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-22 16:39:54 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-22 02:03:15 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
How to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]
Comment
2021-04-21 14:38:53 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-20 21:06:38 -
exception, THROW
Throwing past DO/LOOP
Comment
2021-04-20 14:20:32 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 21:28:53 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 20:28:10 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 20:16:56 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 18:24:43 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2021-04-19 17:05:40 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2021-04-19 12:33:49 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 12:15:56 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2021-04-19 11:39:14 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-19 11:03:24 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 07:08:09 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 06:50:23 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 06:30:23 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-19 04:55:23 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 04:51:00 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2021-04-19 04:21:03 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-19 04:09:12 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-18 16:04:18 -
clarify-find-more-classic-approach
Clarify FIND, more classic approach
Proposal
2021-04-18 15:43:13 -
core, ALLOT
ALLOT in ROMable systems
Request for clarification
2021-04-18 10:10:31 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-18 08:23:54 -
core, STATE
Advantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 17:49:29 -
core, DEFERStore
Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 17:34:37 -
core, TO
What is the intent, purpose or meaning of TO?
Example
2021-04-17 16:14:14 -
core, STATE
Advantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?
Request for clarification
2021-04-17 15:08:48 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-04-17 09:23:48 -
reference-implementations-are-not-normative
Reference implementations are not normative
Proposal
2021-04-15 12:47:32 -
core, DEFERStore
Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-15 10:29:49 -
core, DEFERStore
Does the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?
Request for clarification
2021-04-15 07:34:17 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-10 09:14:58 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-08 11:25:35 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 12:53:15 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 10:17:39 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-07 10:09:00 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-07 08:16:04 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-06 11:54:14 -
core, LEAVE
Stack effect of LEAVE during compilation
Request for clarification
2021-04-06 06:23:08 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 11:10:42 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 10:12:01 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-05 02:08:59 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 15:57:41 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 15:15:25 -
emit-and-non-ascii-values
EMIT and non-ASCII values
Proposal
2021-04-04 01:53:23 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-04-03 08:37:52 -
usage
Size of implementation dependent data types
Request for clarification
2021-03-30 18:43:47 -
core, TwoOVER
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-03-26 19:57:04 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-03-14 18:43:52 -
core, num
Note incompatability (double v single) with some older Forth's.
Comment
2021-03-14 02:01:49 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 22:40:05 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 08:59:39 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 08:44:13 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-13 02:12:02 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-12 16:32:58 -
core, COUNT
Is a counted string limited to 255 chars?
Request for clarification
2021-03-12 07:48:49 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-03-09 19:11:06 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-09 16:02:58 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-08 21:21:49 -
block, BLOCK
Can `BLOCK` transfer from mass storage in the case when block u is already in a block buffer?
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 11:03:41 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 08:31:05 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-03-07 05:18:27 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-06 16:47:27 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-03 04:39:08 -
core, ENDCASE
Proposal: end-case
Comment
2021-03-03 03:53:14 -
core, HOLDS
Specification of HOLDS is ambiguous
Comment
2021-02-19 06:40:29 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-05 08:15:33 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-05 08:12:42 -
core, num
Cell width for numbers
Request for clarification
2021-02-02 10:04:10 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-24 10:39:29 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-24 04:43:29 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-23 12:56:09 -
core, Tick
Is Tick Immediate?
Request for clarification
2021-01-23 09:33:09 -
locals, bColon
Run-Time Section is Missing Words
Comment
2021-01-23 09:24:39 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-23 01:36:26 -
core, TYPE
Suggested reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2021-01-22 20:48:21 -
core, POSTPONE
Needs an example of replacing COMPILE
Example
2021-01-22 10:39:10 -
core, POSTPONE
GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-01-22 02:42:43 -
core, POSTPONE
GT1 not defined
Request for clarification
2021-01-21 16:20:49 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2021-01-14 17:15:18 -
memory, ALLOCATE
write-cell-mem undefined
Request for clarification
2021-01-13 08:41:17 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2021-01-07 01:57:20 -
core, BracketCOMPILE
Obsoleted - by what?
Request for clarification
2021-01-06 10:06:23 -
core, SOURCE
Relationship to block set
Example
2020-12-29 07:27:48 -
core, SOURCE-ID
Should this reference the optional word sets where SOURCE-ID is changed
Example
2020-12-29 07:14:19 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-23 18:24:58 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-09 13:58:40 -
core, TwoStore
Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2020-12-05 10:01:24 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-05 09:31:00 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-02 15:05:55 -
core, TwoStore
Cells numeration in a cell-pair
Comment
2020-12-02 11:42:20 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-12-01 11:54:46 -
xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbook
XML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBook
Proposal
2020-11-28 19:19:56 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 14:07:05 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 11:48:07 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 11:28:08 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 09:06:42 -
usage
Data type for strings
Comment
2020-11-28 01:21:15 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-11-20 14:25:42 -
minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizers
minimalistic core API for recognizers
Proposal
2020-11-19 19:58:48 -
reword-the-term-execution-token-
Reword the term "execution token"
Proposal
2020-11-17 15:48:41 -
recognizer
Recognizer
Proposal
2020-11-17 09:40:35 -
search, DEFINITIONS
off-by-one error in reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
2020-11-14 14:51:43 -
tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics
Tick and undefined execution semantics
Proposal
2020-10-31 21:19:03
