Contributions by ruv
- 
                    core, ACCEPTSource of a stringRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, BUFFERColonthe confusing namesRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, TOShould TO be findable?Request for clarification 
- 
                    case-sensitivityCase sensitivityProposal 
- 
                    core, ACCEPTReceiving a zero-length stringRequest for clarification 
- 
                    notationTerminology and wording regarding "dictionary"Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, EXITexecution of exitRequest for clarification 
- 
                    string, UNESCAPEEtymology and naming issueRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, BracketDEFINEDThe case of undefined interpretation semanticsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, COMPILECommaInterpretation semanticsComment 
- 
                    notationWhat is a standard programComment 
- 
                    core, BUFFERColonAddress between runsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, PARSE-NAMEEtymology and naming convention issueComment 
- 
                    tools, BracketIFPOSTPONE [IF]Request for clarification 
- 
                    executing-compilation-semanticsExecuting compilation semanticsProposal 
- 
                    core, TOAmbiguous conditionsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, TickAmbiguous condition in case of undefined execution semanticsComment 
- 
                    core, POSTPONEAmbiguous condition could be removedComment 
- 
                    core, toINEtymology of ">IN" nameRequest for clarification 
- 
                    file, REFILLAmbiguous conditionsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, IMMEDIATEAmbiguous conditionsComment 
- 
                    tools, SYNONYMReference implementation and POSTPONEComment 
- 
                    tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLISTUnfindable definitionsComment 
- 
                    tools, BracketELSECase-sensitivity independent implementationSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    clarify-find-more-classic-approachClarify FIND, more classic approachProposal 
- 
                    string, REPLACESwording - "current region" term is undefinedComment 
- 
                    better-wording-for-colonBetter wording for ColonProposal 
- 
                    name-interpret-wordingNAME>INTERPRET wordingProposal 
- 
                    core, ColonThe parts of execution semantics and the calling definitionRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, p"(" typo in a testcaseComment 
- 
                    wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-localsWording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for localsProposal 
- 
                    core, StoDWord set of S>D wordRequest for clarification 
- 
                    same-name-token-for-different-wordsSame name token for different wordsProposal 
- 
                    localsRecognizer for localsComment 
- 
                    searchGet execution semantics from ntRequest for clarification 
- 
                    toolsGetting execution semantics from ntRequest for clarification 
- 
                    common-terminology-for-recognizers-discurse-and-specificationsCommon terminology for recognizers discurse and specificationsProposal 
- 
                    tick-and-undefined-execution-semanticsTick and undefined execution semanticsProposal 
- 
                    usageData type for stringsComment 
- 
                    usageData object notion usageComment 
- 
                    core, TwoStoreCells numeration in a cell-pairComment 
- 
                    usageSize of implementation dependent data typesRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, LEAVEStack effect of LEAVE during compilationRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, BracketCOMPILEHow to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]Comment 
- 
                    core, CCommaAdditional test for UTF-16Suggested Testcase 
- 
                    core, BracketCOMPILEA final test case for [COMPILE]Suggested Testcase 
- 
                    core, POSTPONEPortable implementation for POSTPONESuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    wording-change-for-compile-harmonization-with-termsWording change for "COMPILE,": harmonization with termsProposal 
- 
                    file, SqImplementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanismRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, SYNONYMPortable implementation for SYNONYMSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, BracketWhy "[" is specified using immediacy?Request for clarification 
- 
                    better-wording-for-data-field-termBetter wording for "data field" termProposal 
- 
                    better-wording-for-glossary-notation-Better wording for "Glossary notation"Proposal 
- 
                    usageSame execution tokenRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, MARKERAmbiguous conition for MARKERComment 
- 
                    multi-tasking-proposalBetter API for multitaskingComment 
- 
                    core, COMPILECommaImplementing COMPILE, via EXECUTESuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    revert-rewording-the-term-execution-token-Revert rewording the term "execution token"Proposal 
- 
                    formatting-spaces-in-data-type-symbolsFormatting: spaces in data type symbolsProposal 
- 
                    clarification-for-execution-tokenClarification for execution tokenProposal 
- 
                    exclude-zero-from-the-data-types-that-are-identifiersExclude zero from the data types that are identifiersProposal 
- 
                    core, QUITShould QUIT propagate exceptions?Request for clarification 
- 
                    exceptionException word set is not optional any moreComment 
- 
                    
                    Support several versions of the standard in parallelComment 
- 
                    core, RESTORE-INPUTAddress of the input buffer after RESTORE-INPUTRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, RESTORE-INPUTAbout behavior or RESTORE-INPUTComment 
- 
                    core, ROLLExample implementation for ROLLSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, PICKExample implementation for PICKSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    exception, THROWInput source after THROWComment 
- 
                    obsolescence-for-save-input-and-restore-inputObsolescence for SAVE-INPUT and RESTORE-INPUTProposal 
- 
                    update-rationale-for-sliteralUpdate rationale for SLITERALProposal 
- 
                    tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-A better approach for SYNONYM wordingComment 
- 
                    fix-stack-comments-for-n-r-and-nr-Why do we use +n and not u in the stack diagram for n>r and nr>Request for clarification 
- 
                    new-words-latest-name-and-latest-name-inNew words: latest-name and latest-name-inProposal 
- 
                    tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLISTTRAVERSE-WORDLIST must not expose the current definitionSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    core, LSHIFTAn ambiguous condition in LSHIFTRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, SPACESBehavior of `0 SPACES`Request for clarification 
- 
                    docRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, UNLOOPIs it possible to eliminate the need for `UNLOOP`?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, PlusUsage of the `n|u` data typeRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, CStoreData type of a parameters in `c!`Request for clarification 
- 
                    support-for-single-line-comments-during-evaluate-Support for single line comments during `evaluate`Proposal 
- 
                    allow-the-text-interpreter-to-use-word-and-the-pictured-numeric-outputAllow the text interpreter to use `WORD` and the pictured numeric outputProposal 
- 
                    core, TickEliminating ambiguous conditions for TickRequest for clarification 
- 
                    float, REPRESENTBehavior of `represent` when buffer length is zeroRequest for clarification 
- 
                    locals, bColonStack diagram for `{:`Request for clarification 
- 
                    string, DivSTRINGUnspecified ambiguous condition in /STRINGRequest for clarification 
- 
                    usageTemporary removing system-compilation itemsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, ABORTState of other stacks after ABORTRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, ELSEExample implementation for `ELSE`Suggested reference implementation 
- 
                    block, EMPTY-BUFFERSBehavior of EMPTY-BUFFERS when BLK is nonzeroRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, TOA value-flavoured variable may be immediateSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    core, PARSE-NAMEMultiple WHILEComment 
- 
                    tools, NAMEtoINTERPRETHow to perform the interpretation semantics for a wordRequest for clarification 
- 
                    incorrect-use-of-semantics-termsIncorrect use of semantics termsProposal 
- 
                    core, MARKERThe search order and compilation word list after a marker executionRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, CODEMay `CODE` be a parsing word?Request for clarification 
- 
                    tools, NAMEtoSTRING`NAME>STRING` result is transientRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, PICKInterpretation of the top input parameter of PICKComment 
Replies by ruv
- 
                    core, RECURSEproposal: recurse' to complement recurseComment 
- 
                    
                    Digests and Meta discussionExample 
- 
                    core, ENDCASEProposal: end-caseComment 
- 
                    wlscope-wordlists-switching-made-easierWLSCOPE -- wordlists switching made easierProposal 
- 
                    defer-this-not-DEFER this not :-)Proposal 
- 
                    tools, SYNONYMIncomplete specification of SYNONYMComment 
- 
                    directory-experiemental-proposalDirectory experiemental proposalProposal 
- 
                    
                    Session timer and preseving contributionsExample 
- 
                    the-value-of-state-should-be-restoredThe value of STATE should be restoredProposal 
- 
                    bl-rationale-is-wrongBL rationale is wrongProposal 
- 
                    core, FILLSuggested reference implementationSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    clarify-findClarify FINDProposal 
- 
                    tools, NAMEtoCOMPILENAME>COMPILE resultComment 
- 
                    
                    Need lock on already posted commentsExample 
- 
                    find-namefind-nameProposal 
- 
                    tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-Tighten the specification of SYNONYM (version 1)Proposal 
- 
                    s-request-for-discussion-revised-2018-08-16-S( "Request for Discussion" (revised 2018-08-16)Proposal 
- 
                    multi-tasking-proposalMulti-Tasking ProposalProposal 
- 
                    core, BUFFERColonthe confusing namesRequest for clarification 
- 
                    search, ALSOALSO without VOCABULARYRequest for clarification 
- 
                    case-sensitivityCase sensitivityProposal 
- 
                    f-r-and-fr-to-support-dynamically-scoped-floating-point-variablesF>R and FR> to support dynamically-scoped floating point variablesProposal 
- 
                    core, QUITThe reference implementation is incorrectSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, CHARBehavior when no text foundComment 
- 
                    core, ACCEPTReceiving a zero-length stringRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, EXITexecution of exitRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, BracketDEFINEDThe case of undefined interpretation semanticsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, COMPILECommaInterpretation semanticsComment 
- 
                    tools, NAMEtoINTERPRETHow can the zero result be used in a Standard program?Request for clarification 
- 
                    notationWhat is a standard programComment 
- 
                    revise-rationale-of-buffer-Revise Rationale of Buffer:Proposal 
- 
                    core, BUFFERColonAddress between runsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, PARSE-NAMEEtymology and naming convention issueComment 
- 
                    tools, BracketIFPOSTPONE [IF]Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, TickAmbiguous condition in case of undefined execution semanticsComment 
- 
                    exception, CATCHThe specification of CATCHRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, POSTPONEAmbiguous condition could be removedComment 
- 
                    core, BLTest example numeric base?Request for clarification 
- 
                    coreGNU C RESTRICT would make sense in the standardSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    block, LOADGetting the block contentsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    toolsdescription of "nt" in the standardRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, IMMEDIATEAmbiguous conditionsComment 
- 
                    cs-drop-revised-2019-08-22-CS-DROP (revised 2019-08-22)Proposal 
- 
                    case-insensitivityCase insensitivityProposal 
- 
                    remove-the-rules-of-find-Remove the “rules of FIND”Proposal 
- 
                    tools, SYNONYMReference implementation of SYNONYMSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    tools, SYNONYMTest cases for SYNONYMSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    clarify-find-more-classic-approachClarify FIND, more classic approachProposal 
- 
                    implementlicenseRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, RECURSEWhy RECURSE is needed?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, WITHINsample implementation that can also be interpretedSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    better-wording-for-colonBetter wording for ColonProposal 
- 
                    name-interpret-wordingNAME>INTERPRET wordingProposal 
- 
                    core, ColonThe parts of execution semantics and the calling definitionRequest for clarification 
- 
                    recognizer-rfd-rephrase-2020Recognizer RfD rephrase 2020Proposal 
- 
                    wording-declare-undefined-interpretation-semantics-for-localsWording: declare undefined interpretation semantics for localsProposal 
- 
                    same-name-token-for-different-wordsSame name token for different wordsProposal 
- 
                    localsRecognizer for localsComment 
- 
                    core, SMDivREMThere is error in testingComment 
- 
                    recognizerRecognizerProposal 
- 
                    core, PARSEWhat happens when parse reaches the end of the parse area and the parse delimiter was not found?Request for clarification 
- 
                    optional-ieee-754-binary-floating-point-word-setOPTIONAL IEEE 754 BINARY FLOATING-POINT WORD SETProposal 
- 
                    nestable-recognizer-sequencesNestable Recognizer SequencesProposal 
- 
                    searchGet execution semantics from ntRequest for clarification 
- 
                    toolsGetting execution semantics from ntRequest for clarification 
- 
                    traverse-wordlist-does-not-find-unnamed-unfinished-definitionsTraverse-wordlist does not find unnamed/unfinished definitionsProposal 
- 
                    xml-forth-standard-migration-from-latex-to-docbookXML Forth Standard - migration from LaTeX to DocBookProposal 
- 
                    call-for-vote-ambiguous-condition-in-16-3-3Call for Vote - Ambiguous condition in 16.3.3Proposal 
- 
                    reword-the-term-execution-token-Reword the term "execution token"Proposal 
- 
                    an-alternative-to-the-recognizer-proposalAn alternative to the RECOGNIZER proposalProposal 
- 
                    minimalistic-core-api-for-recognizersminimalistic core API for recognizersProposal 
- 
                    common-terminology-for-recognizers-discurse-and-specificationsCommon terminology for recognizers discurse and specificationsProposal 
- 
                    tick-and-undefined-execution-semanticsTick and undefined execution semanticsProposal 
- 
                    usageData type for stringsComment 
- 
                    usageData object notion usageComment 
- 
                    core, TwoStoreCells numeration in a cell-pairComment 
- 
                    core, POSTPONENeeds an example of replacing COMPILEExample 
- 
                    usageSize of implementation dependent data typesRequest for clarification 
- 
                    emit-and-non-ascii-valuesEMIT and non-ASCII valuesProposal 
- 
                    core, LEAVEStack effect of LEAVE during compilationRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, DEFERStoreDoes the standard assume that DEFER was created with CREATE?Request for clarification 
- 
                    reference-implementations-are-not-normativeReference implementations are not normativeProposal 
- 
                    core, STATEAdvantages of a Forth system with a STATE flag?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, ALLOTALLOT in ROMable systemsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    exception, THROWThrowing past DO/LOOPComment 
- 
                    core, BracketCOMPILEHow to avoid default compilation semantics in the specification for [COMPILE]Comment 
- 
                    core, CCommaAdditional test for UTF-16Suggested Testcase 
- 
                    xchar, XC-WIDTHReturn value of XC-WIDTH for control charactersRequest for clarification 
- 
                    right-bracketWeb site problem?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, POSTPONEPortable implementation for POSTPONESuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    file, SqImplementation for «S"» via the immediacy mechanismRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, SYNONYMPortable implementation for SYNONYMSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    string, DivSTRINGPossible Reference ImplementationSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, BracketWhy "[" is specified using immediacy?Request for clarification 
- 
                    place-placePLACE +PLACEProposal 
- 
                    string, CMOVECMOVE implementation based on MOVESuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    tick-and-undefined-execution-semantics-2Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2Proposal 
- 
                    specify-that-0-throw-pops-the-0Specify that 0 THROW pops the 0Proposal 
- 
                    better-wording-for-data-field-termBetter wording for "data field" termProposal 
- 
                    better-wording-for-glossary-notation-Better wording for "Glossary notation"Proposal 
- 
                    core, SqForth Programmer's HandbookExample 
- 
                    core, POSTPONEI suggest to complete the testComment 
- 
                    testsuitemany tests appear to only assess interpretation semantics of test subjectsSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    core, Cqc-addr used in stack diagramsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    localsContradiction With do-loopsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    localsAccessing Remaining Data Stack?Request for clarification 
- 
                    search, FORTH-WORDLISTinconsistent namingRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, VARIABLEPossible Reference ImplementationSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, MINPossible Reference ImplementationSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    testsuiteF.3 Seems in ErrorComment 
- 
                    usageSame execution tokenRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, RFetchSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    multi-tasking-proposalRound-robin vs PreemptiveExample 
- 
                    multi-tasking-proposalStack Sizes?Example 
- 
                    multi-tasking-proposalInteractions with MARKER and KILL-TASKExample 
- 
                    core, ColonNONAME:NONAME PrimitivesRequest for clarification 
- 
                    multi-tasking-proposalBetter API for multitaskingComment 
- 
                    core, COMPILECommaImplementing COMPILE, via EXECUTESuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    revert-rewording-the-term-execution-token-Revert rewording the term "execution token"Proposal 
- 
                    formatting-spaces-in-data-type-symbolsFormatting: spaces in data type symbolsProposal 
- 
                    clarification-for-execution-tokenClarification for execution tokenProposal 
- 
                    exclude-zero-from-the-data-types-that-are-identifiersExclude zero from the data types that are identifiersProposal 
- 
                    core, QUITShould QUIT propagate exceptions?Request for clarification 
- 
                    exceptionException word set is not optional any moreComment 
- 
                    pronounciationsPronounciationsProposal 
- 
                    file, SOURCE-IDIncorrect Test PatternSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    core, SAVE-INPUTBogus Test Case for SAVE-INPUTSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    docComment 
- 
                    relax-documentation-requirements-of-ambiguous-conditionsRelax documentation requirements of Ambiguous ConditionsProposal 
- 
                    core, ROLLExample implementation for ROLLSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, PICKExample implementation for PICKSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    block, bs"... the remainder of the current line."?Request for clarification 
- 
                    tools, NtoRBad Stack Notation?Comment 
- 
                    core, SAVE-INPUTIs data stack required?Request for clarification 
- 
                    exception, THROWInput source after THROWComment 
- 
                    core, RECURSETail call eliminationComment 
- 
                    core, bsMaybe `REFILL`?Suggested reference implementation 
- 
                    obsolescence-for-save-input-and-restore-inputObsolescence for SAVE-INPUT and RESTORE-INPUTProposal 
- 
                    update-rationale-for-sliteralUpdate rationale for SLITERALProposal 
- 
                    core, CONSTANTPossible Reference ImplementationSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    file, INCLUDEDExample 
- 
                    core, ERASEExample 
- 
                    exception, THROWImlementation seems wrong for the "-2" caseSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    include-a-revised-79-standard-specification-for-to-core-ext-Include a revised 79-STANDARD Specification for "><" To "Core Ext"Proposal 
- 
                    fix-stack-comments-for-n-r-and-nr-Fix stack comments for N>R and NR>Proposal 
- 
                    tighten-the-specification-of-synonym-version-1-A better approach for SYNONYM wordingComment 
- 
                    fix-stack-comments-for-n-r-and-nr-Why do we use +n and not u in the stack diagram for n>r and nr>Request for clarification 
- 
                    new-words-latest-name-and-latest-name-inNew words: latest-name and latest-name-inProposal 
- 
                    tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLISTTRAVERSE-WORDLIST must not expose the current definitionSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    string-store-and-fetchString store and fetchProposal 
- 
                    core, WORDWORD and the text interpreterRequest for clarification 
- 
                    search, SEARCH-WORDLISTNDCS xtRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, TRAVERSE-WORDLISTshadowed namesRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, Colonare colon-defs supposed to be compiled in data space?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, DOloopsys in data?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, QUITINTERPRETSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, LSHIFTAn ambiguous condition in LSHIFTRequest for clarification 
- 
                    
                    The Standard page does not show Chapters 1-5Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, SPACESBehavior of `0 SPACES`Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, UNLOOPIs it possible to eliminate the need for `UNLOOP`?Request for clarification 
- 
                    notationData space seems to be used invonsistently when comparing the definitions of "character string" and "data space".Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, PlusUsage of the `n|u` data typeRequest for clarification 
- 
                    special-memory-access-wordsSpecial memory access wordsProposal 
- 
                    support-for-single-line-comments-during-evaluate-Support for single line comments during `evaluate`Proposal 
- 
                    allow-the-text-interpreter-to-use-word-and-the-pictured-numeric-outputAllow the text interpreter to use `WORD` and the pictured numeric outputProposal 
- 
                    float, REPRESENTBehavior of `represent` when buffer length is zeroRequest for clarification 
- 
                    locals, bColonStack diagram for `{:`Request for clarification 
- 
                    obsolescence-for-save-input-and-restore-inputSAVE-INPUTComment 
- 
                    string, DivSTRINGUnspecified ambiguous condition in /STRINGRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, LITERALcompile semantics or compile action of literal wordRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, Colondefinion and use of colon-sys and nest-sysRequest for clarification 
- 
                    usageTemporary removing system-compilation itemsRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, ELSEResolve the forward reference orig1 using the location following the appended run-time semantics.Comment 
- 
                    block, EMPTY-BUFFERSBehavior of EMPTY-BUFFERS when BLK is nonzeroRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, WORDBehavior on oversized WORDRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, NAMEtoINTERPRETHow to perform the interpretation semantics for a wordRequest for clarification 
- 
                    incorrect-use-of-semantics-termsIncorrect use of semantics termsProposal 
- 
                    known-undefined-word-xlerbKnown undefined word XLERBProposal 
- 
                    octal-prefixOctal prefixProposal 
- 
                    core, qDOReturn Stack Notation Mildly InaccurateRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, ColonNONAMEwhere definition is compiled?Request for clarification 
- 
                    tools, NAMEtoSTRING`NAME>STRING` result is transientRequest for clarification 
- 
                    search, ONLYFirst Tests Seem WrongSuggested Testcase 
- 
                    core, pCan balanced () be nested inside ( and .( comments?Request for clarification 
- 
                    notationWording on ccc prohibits \" inside S\"Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, UNUSEDWhat should the behavior be if the system has no hard-coded limit on size?Request for clarification 
- 
                    usage3.2.1.1 vs. Double-cell integer behavior on unusual integer architecturesRequest for clarification 
- 
                    core, OFMay OF modify the enclosing case-sys on the control stack?Request for clarification 
- 
                    tools, NRfromReference implementation should not use -ROTSuggested reference implementation 
- 
                    core, DOESIs it ambiguous to execute the use of does> after :NONAME or FORGET?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, Dotqbehavior on newlineRequest for clarification 
- 
                    tools, BracketUNDEFINEDIs behavior ambiguous if a name cannot be parsed?Request for clarification 
- 
                    core, ZeroEqualHardware zero vs all bits zeroRequest for clarification 
- 
                    recognizer-committee-proposal-2025-09-11Recognizer committee proposal 2025-09-11Proposal 
- 
                    non-parsing-createNon parsing CREATEProposal 
- 
                    core, PICKInterpretation of the top input parameter of PICKComment 
- 
                    standardize-the-well-known-rotStandardize the well-known -ROTProposal 
- 
                    standardize-the-well-known-rdropStandardize the well-known RDROPProposal