Contributions by EricBlake
-
usage
Typo in 3.2.1.2
Comment
-
core, p
Can balanced () be nested inside ( and .( comments?
Request for clarification
-
testsuite
F.3.18 typo
Comment
-
notation
Wording on ccc prohibits \" inside S\"
Request for clarification
-
core, UNUSED
What should the behavior be if the system has no hard-coded limit on size?
Request for clarification
-
core, IF
Typo in test
Suggested Testcase
-
core, AGAIN
Suggested test
Suggested Testcase
-
core, VALUE
Compilation of a VALUE child word should not inline its current value
Suggested Testcase
-
core, DEFERFetch
Must the xt returned by DEFER@ have the same value as the one passed to DEFER!, or merely the same behavior?
Request for clarification
-
usage
3.2.1.1 vs. Double-cell integer behavior on unusual integer architectures
Request for clarification
-
core, CASE
Cross-reference to the suggested implementation
Suggested reference implementation
-
core, OF
May OF modify the enclosing case-sys on the control stack?
Request for clarification
-
tools, NRfrom
Reference implementation should not use -ROT
Suggested reference implementation
-
tools, NtoR
Enhance n>r test to validate that n>r r@ r>n sees n
Suggested Testcase
-
core, TwotoR
Suggested implementations
Suggested reference implementation
-
Example in header should feature standard Forth
Comment
-
double, DEqual
d= reference implementation
Suggested reference implementation
-
core, DOES
Is it ambiguous to execute the use of does> after :NONAME or FORGET?
Request for clarification
Replies by EricBlake
-
core, FMDivMOD
Implementing FM/MOD with SM/REM
Suggested reference implementation
-
find-name
find-name
Proposal
-
core, IMMEDIATE
Ambiguous conditions
Comment
-
usage
Same execution token
Request for clarification
-
pronounciations
Pronounciations
Proposal
-
testsuite
F.3.18 typo
Comment
-
core, AGAIN
Suggested test
Suggested Testcase
-
core, DEFERFetch
Must the xt returned by DEFER@ have the same value as the one passed to DEFER!, or merely the same behavior?
Request for clarification
-
usage
3.2.1.1 vs. Double-cell integer behavior on unusual integer architectures
Request for clarification
-
tools, NRfrom
Reference implementation should not use -ROT
Suggested reference implementation
-
core, Colon
`?:`?
Comment
-
double, DNEGATE
Possible Reference Implementation
Suggested reference implementation
-
core, DOES
Is it ambiguous to execute the use of does> after :NONAME or FORGET?
Request for clarification