[220] 2022-02-15 20:00:52 UlrichHoffmann wrote:

proposal - Agenda Forth-200x interim Meeting 2020-02-18T14:00Z

Agenda Forth-200x interim Meeting 2020-02-18T14:00Z

Estimated duration 120 minutes + workshop

• Welcome / Participants (10 min)

• Agreement on the agenda (5 min) Do we have any additional points to discuss?

• Review of Procedures (5 min) What is the recommended way the committee communicates?

• Review of new Proposals (since the September'21 meeting) (40 min)

  • Better wording for "Glossary notation" (ruv)

  • Better wording for "data field" term (ruv)

  • Specify that 0 THROW pops the 0 (Anton Ertl)

  • Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2 (Stephen Pelc)

• Bio Break (10 min)

• Review of other Contributions (since the September'21 meeting) (40 min)

  • Forth Programmer's Handbook (core, Sq #219)
    2022-02-12 16:13:14 - flaagel

  • Implement with ROT (core, TwoSWAP #218)
    2022-01-28 10:17:58 - David Jones

  • New Line characters in a string passed to EVALUATE (core, EVALUATE #217)
    2021-11-22 17:37:54 - Stephen Pelc

  • Some clarifications (file, READ-LINE #216)
    2021-11-01 19:19:13 - Anton Ertl

• Any other business (5 min)

• Date of next meeting (5 min)

• Workshop (Forth Modification Lab) (open end)

  • Value flavoured structs
    • What we intend
    • existing approached ClassVFX (Willem Botha), Extended Values (Nick Nelson), FMS (Doug Hoffman)
      Who will prepare a 3-minute introduction to each of these approaches?
    • New ideas for value flavoured structs
    • discussion

[r786] 2022-02-13 17:27:28 ruv replies:

example - Forth Programmer's Handbook

the outcome of the test should not depend on the current BASE.

More precisely, it should not rely on not decimal BASE

It's a known problem if the test suite, and of course it should be fixed.

[r787] 2022-02-15 20:02:09 UlrichHoffmann replies:

proposal - Agenda Forth-200x interim Meeting 2020-02-18T14:00Z

Agenda Forth-200x interim Meeting 2022-02-18T14:00Z

Estimated duration 120 minutes + workshop

• Welcome / Participants (10 min)

• Agreement on the agenda (5 min) Do we have any additional points to discuss?

• Review of Procedures (5 min) What is the recommended way the committee communicates?

• Review of new Proposals (since the September'21 meeting) (40 min)

  • Better wording for "Glossary notation" (ruv)

  • Better wording for "data field" term (ruv)

  • Specify that 0 THROW pops the 0 (Anton Ertl)

  • Tick and undefined execution semantics - 2 (Stephen Pelc)

• Bio Break (10 min)

• Review of other Contributions (since the September'21 meeting) (40 min)

  • Forth Programmer's Handbook (core, Sq #219)
    2022-02-12 16:13:14 - flaagel

  • Implement with ROT (core, TwoSWAP #218)
    2022-01-28 10:17:58 - David Jones

  • New Line characters in a string passed to EVALUATE (core, EVALUATE #217)
    2021-11-22 17:37:54 - Stephen Pelc

  • Some clarifications (file, READ-LINE #216)
    2021-11-01 19:19:13 - Anton Ertl

• Any other business (5 min)

• Date of next meeting (5 min)

• Workshop (Forth Modification Lab) (open end)

  • Value flavoured structs
    • What we intend
    • existing approached ClassVFX (Willem Botha), Extended Values (Nick Nelson), FMS (Doug Hoffman)
      Who will prepare a 3-minute introduction to each of these approaches?
    • New ideas for value flavoured structs
    • discussion