,---------------.
| Contributions |
`---------------´


,------------------------------------------
| 2018-09-22 09:05:37  ruv  wrote:
| requestClarification - Should TO be findable?
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/core/TO#contribution-72
`------------------------------------------
Since "an ambiguous condition exists if any of POSTPONE, [COMPILE], ' or ['] are applied to TO",  does ambiguous condition exist if `[DEFINED]` is applied to `TO` ?

May a standard programme get xt of `TO` via `SEARCH-WORDLIST`?  If yes, what semantics should this xt bring?

May `TO` word be absent in FORTH-WORDLIST in a standard Forth system that actually supports `TO something`?



,---------.
| Replies |
`---------´


,------------------------------------------
| 2018-09-22 10:59:45  ruv  replies:
| requestClarification - ALSO without VOCABULARY 
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/search/ALSO#reply-192
`------------------------------------------
I prefer to make `VOCABULARY`, `FORTH`, and `ALSO` words obsolescent. In place of these words the new words to work with wordlists in **modular manner** should be designed and added.