,---------------.
| Contributions |
`---------------´


,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 13:29:09  AntonErtl  wrote:
| example - Pronounciation
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/float/StoF#contribution-254
`------------------------------------------
In keeping with the style of other pronounciations (e.g., for `s>d`), the pronounciation for `s>f` should be "s-to-f".


,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 13:48:50  AntonErtl  wrote:
| comment - Pronounciation
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/float/FtoS#contribution-255
`------------------------------------------
In keeping with the style of other pronounciations (e.g., for `s>d`), the pronounciation for `f>s` should be "f-to-s".


,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 13:51:36  AntonErtl  wrote:
| comment - Pronounciation
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/double/DUless#contribution-256
`------------------------------------------



,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 14:04:40  AntonErtl  wrote:
| comment - Pronounciation
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/xchar/MinusTRAILING-GARBAGE#contribution-257
`------------------------------------------
In keeping with the style for `-trailing`, the pronounciation of `-trailing-garbage` should be "dash-trailing-garbage".


,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 14:07:41  AntonErtl  wrote:
| comment - Pronounciation
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/xchar/PlusXDivSTRING#contribution-258
`------------------------------------------
A better pronounciation would be "plus-x-slash-string".


,---------.
| Replies |
`---------´


,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 10:08:22  ruv  replies:
| proposal - BL rationale is wrong
| see: https://forth-standard.org/proposals/bl-rationale-is-wrong#reply-846
`------------------------------------------
Due to a bug in the web-site engine, now it renders two spaces as one in an inline code fragment:

>  `: _BL ( -- c ) S"  " DROP C@ ;`

```
\ It shows a string having length 0
S" "
\ instead of a string having length 1
S"  " 
```
(it works in code blocks, but doesn't work in inline code fragments)



,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 13:58:45  AntonErtl  replies:
| comment - Pronounciation
| see: https://forth-standard.org/standard/double/DUless#reply-847
`------------------------------------------
There are two styles if pronounciation for `<`:

"less": `0< <# d0< du<`

"less-than": `< d< f0< f< u<`

This should be unified.  Either all "less" or all "less-than"

We have the same problem with `>`:

"greater": `#> 0>`

"greater-than": `> u>`


,------------------------------------------
| 2022-08-15 15:41:23  ruv  replies:
| proposal - Exclude zero from the data types that are identifiers
| see: https://forth-standard.org/proposals/exclude-zero-from-the-data-types-that-are-identifiers#reply-848
`------------------------------------------
Should the notation `{0}` be also described?  It's a [singleton](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_(mathematics)).

Erratum: "is a member<u>s</u> of" should be read as "is a member of".

In the data-type relationships, a question sign is shown due to a [bug](https://github.com/GeraldWodni/forth-standard.org/issues/39) in the website engine.